Small businessgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
3 categories · Named, not rankedDatanyze
17Judge labels
0First choices
6Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Datanyze was named 6 times in Intent data and 2 other categories, where Apollo.io led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market18 of 60
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In intent data · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Datanyze for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 18 of 60 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Data enrichment | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 42 of 50 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 0% | 45 of 52 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Datanyze held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Intent data · by segment
Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 16 of 58, unchanged
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 18 of 60, unchanged |
| Enrichment | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 42 of 50 |
| Sales intel | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 45 of 52, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Datanyze across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Datanyze across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative7 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for Technical/Product Intent ... Generally more affordable and easier to understand” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Intent data · direct prompt · alternative
“The Best for Tech Stack Signals: Datanyze (formerly BuiltWith)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Intent data · budget prompt · alternative
“Lightweight browser-based tool, affordable for small teams” Kimi K2 · Enrichment · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Datanyze (now owned by ZoomInfo) had a reputation for shallow datasets” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Enrichment · negative prompt · hard negative
“Datanyze (poor data + class action + non-existent support)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Datanyze, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Datanyze was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Datanyze, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Datanyze was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Datanyze. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 17 answers that named Datanyze and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com7
amplemarket.com6
demandbase.com6
salesmotion.io6
bookyourdata.com4
cleanlist.ai4
g2.com4
snov.io4
enricher.io3
knock-ai.com3
Forty-seven of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Datanyze came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
datanyze.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Datanyze takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.ShowHide
Search and answers
datanyze.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Datanyze takes 0% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 27%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b intent data provider”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,300 a month (“datanyze”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 42 a month
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 60 in intent data
Segment leader
27%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 11 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Follow Datanyze
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Datanyze.ShowHide
The company
Datanyze.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- datanyze.com
- Headquarters
- San Mateo, United States
- Ownership
- Part of ZoomInfo
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Find and connect with cold sales prospects within minutes using affordable, accurate contact information from Datanyze.
- For
- B2B sales pros
- Price stated
- Datanyze offers a range of free and premium packages to accommodate your business needs datanyze.com
- Free plan or trial
- Try It Free datanyze.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Datanyze's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: datanyze.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Datanyze's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Datanyze, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Datanyze by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Datanyze is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Datanyze, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.