Every category where a model named Datanyze for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data enrichment	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	14 of 56	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 70%
Account-based marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	76 of 76	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Datanyze yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Datanyze across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Technographics + contacts via Chrome ext | Tech stack insights on tightest budget” Grok 4.1 Fast · Enrichment · budget prompt · alternative

“Datanyze offers deep insights at a lower price point than many competitors” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Enrichment · budget prompt · alternative

“Other options to consider are Cleanlist, Snov.io, and Datanyze” Llama 4 Maverick · Enrichment · budget prompt · alternative

“or Datanyze ($29/month) for basic needs” Kimi K2 · Enrichment · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Unethical data collection: Reports indicate that Datanyze has been accused of unethical data collection practices.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Enrichment · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid or Strongly Reconsider ... Datanyze ... Support issues: Unresponsive customer service” Kimi K2 · ABM · negative prompt · hard negative

“Poor/unresponsive customer support (login verification lockouts), inconsistent data accuracy” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ABM · negative prompt · soft negative

“*Approach with Caution*” Mistral Small · ABM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Datanyze, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Datanyze was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Apollo.io17 of 229Not in the top three

ZoomInfo17 of 223Not in the top three

6sense12 of 221Not in the top three

Demandbase11 of 221Not in the top three

Lusha11 of 220Not in the top three

Snov.io10 of 223Not in the top three

Bombora6 of 221Not in the top three

Cognism6 of 221Not in the top three

Dealfront6 of 220Not in the top three

Terminus6 of 220Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Datanyze. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 22 answers that named Datanyze and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

amplemarket.com3

cleanlist.ai3

demandbase.com3

salesmotion.io3

artisan.co2

autobound.ai2

fullenrich.com2

marketbetter.ai2

miniloop.ai2

overloop.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Datanyze came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

amplemarket.com/blog/best-b2b-data-enrichment-tools3

demandbase.com/blog/b2b-data-enrichment-tools3

artisan.co/blog/b2b-data-enrichment-tools2

autobound.ai/blog/top-10-data-enrichment-platforms-for-b2b-sales-in-2025-your-guide-to-sma2

cleanlist.ai/blog/15-best-b2b-data-enrichment-providers-in-2025-ranked2

cleanlist.ai/blog/2026-03-31-best-data-enrichment-tools-20262

fullenrich.com/tools/b2b-data-vendors2

fullenrich.com/tools/data-enrichment-tools2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

Datanyze.

Website: datanyze.com
Headquarters: San Mateo, United States
Ownership: Part of ZoomInfo

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Datanyze's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Datanyze, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at datanyze.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.