| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversational intelligence and call recording | Sales | 0% | 20 of 91 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Avoma at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI voice agents | Customer | 0% | 101 of 103 | 100% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Retell AI at 27% | |
| Contact center quality assurance | Customer | 0% | 32 of 81 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by EvaluAgent at 28% | |
| Contact center platforms | Customer | 0% | 47 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Five9 at 18% |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conversation intel | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 21 → 20 of 91 |
| AI voice agents | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 101 of 103, unchanged |
| Contact center QA | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 32 of 81, unchanged |
| Contact center | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 47 of 86, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If your priority is contact-center performance and supervision, Cresta, CloudTalk, and CallMiner are more relevant.” Perplexity Sonar · Conversation intel · comparative prompt · alternative
“Cresta - Strong for contact centers with custom-trained models” Kimi K2 · Conversation intel · negative prompt · alternative
“check out Observe.AI, Cresta, or Kaizo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contact center QA · scale prompt · alternative
“An agent-assist and real-time QA overlay.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contact center QA · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Recently hit with a federal class-action lawsuit (filed June 2025 in California) alleging violations of state privacy laws (e.g., CIPA)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Conversation intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Skip enterprise-focused platforms like PolyAI, Cognigy, or Cresta” Kimi K2 · AI voice agents · direct prompt · hard negative
“Cresta: AI coaching layered with agents, expensive at scale, augmenting human agents, not replacing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI voice agents · comparative prompt · soft negative
“cautious if you need a lightweight tool or don't have enough call volume” Perplexity Sonar · AI voice agents · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 38 of the 38 answers that named Cresta and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-eight of the 125 domain citations in answers naming Cresta came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 317 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 163 | 17 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| News or press | 146 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 61 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 32 | undated | |||
| Case study | 22 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 20 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 9 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 7 | 0 | 2026-06-12 |
Every page cresta.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Cresta's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: cresta.com, trust.cresta.com, cresta.com/platform-overview, cresta.com/customer-stories, cresta.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cresta's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cresta, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cresta by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: