AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › PolyAI · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

PolyAI

59Judge labels
12First choices
13Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in AI voice agents for enterprise buyers
Rank 21 of 103 in the mid-market standingcriticized challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 18 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PolyAI →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In ai voice agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PolyAI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI voice agentsCustomer0%21 of 10333%18criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PolyAI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PolyAI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501012
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar02013
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200033
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna03003
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels3
Paraphrase12 labels8
Comparative21 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative9 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative59 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Focuses on enterprise customer-service calls and integrating voice assistants into existing telephony or contact-center systems.” GPT-6 Luna · AI voice agents · comparative prompt · alternative
“PolyAI is recommended for enterprise contact centers with the highest containment rates and proven ROI” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI voice agents · comparative prompt · alternative
“PolyAI builds bespoke, enterprise-grade voice assistants that scale across legacy call center systems” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI voice agents · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you need enterprise-grade conversation handling for complex customer service → PolyAI” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI voice agents · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Skip enterprise-focused platforms like PolyAI, Cognigy, or Cresta” Kimi K2 · AI voice agents · direct prompt · hard negative
“cautious if you do not already have enterprise contact-center infrastructure, if your budget is limited” Perplexity Sonar · AI voice agents · negative prompt · soft negative
“High minimum contract size and custom pricing make it inaccessible for many smaller teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI voice agents · negative prompt · soft negative
“PolyAI — Enterprise-trained models (may be heavy for 500-person co)” Kimi K2 · AI voice agents · scale prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PolyAI, over the 59 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PolyAI was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Retell AI42 of 5914Not among the top eight
Bland AI34 of 593Not among the top eight
Vapi31 of 595Not among the top eight
Cognigy27 of 593Not among the top eight
Synthflow27 of 591Not among the top eight
Sierra18 of 590Not among the top eight
Parloa10 of 590Not among the top eight
CloudTalk9 of 593Not among the top eight
Kore.ai9 of 591Not among the top eight
Cresta9 of 590Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PolyAI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 58 of the 59 answers that named PolyAI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

retellai.com48
cloudtalk.io33
synthflow.ai23
getvoip.com21
rasa.com18
vellum.ai16
bland.ai15
parloa.com15
deepgram.com14
poly.aiYour site14

203 of the 217 domain citations in answers naming PolyAI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

poly.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PolyAI takes 0% of first choices and Retell AI takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai voice agent platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai voice agent platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
823,000 a month (“polyai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
93 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 336,300 a month
Searches its site ranks for
473 · 41 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,266
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $74 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 78 text, 24 image, 18 video · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown September 2025, as PolyAI Technologies, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 94 in the year, 26 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 103 in AI voice agents
Segment leader
27%
Retell AI
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
59 answers
Its own site cited
in 58 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on poly.ai
1,174
subdomains included
Content
623
counted in the table below
Documentation
386
Product · Integration
9 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog318112026-10-02CRM
Podcast or video10762026-09-10
Conference or event5092026-10-20
Report or ebook4602026-05-11
Case study3202026-05-29
Webinar or virtual event2512026-08-19
Template or tool2102024-10-31
Glossary or explainer2002024-12-13
Comparison302024-04-05
News or press1undated

Most recent

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on poly.ai state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page poly.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow PolyAI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

PolyAI is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Enterprise voice AI that finishes what your customers start. Dialog agents on PolyAI's own models act in your systems and get better with every call.
For
enterprise
Price stated
Ongoing use of the voice agent is priced on a per-minute basis poly.ai/pricing
Integrations claimed
7 poly.ai/security
Certifications
SOC 2+ Type 2ISO 27001PCI DSSGDPRSOC 2ISO 27001-certifiedISO/IEC 27001:2022HIPAA (BAA available)
Hosting
USUKEUAPAC
Customers named
SafeRide HealthCarter'sPGEFogo de ChãoUnicredit Zagrebacka bankaAudibelMelting PotHawksmoor
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial

What PolyAI's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: poly.ai, poly.ai/pricing, poly.ai/security, poly.ai/platform/dialog-rsn-1, poly.ai/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PolyAI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PolyAI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PolyAI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where PolyAI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name PolyAI, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at poly.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.