AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Bland AI · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Bland AI

105Judge labels
7First choices
25Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in AI voice agents for enterprise buyers
Rank 5 of 103 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 18% of its 34 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Bland AI →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ai voice agents · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Bland AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
AI voice agentsCustomer3%5 of 10318%34accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Bland AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Bland AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501012
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash03014
Perplexity Sonar01113
Grok 4.1 Fast13105
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash03003
Kimi K212025
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B02002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels2
Paraphrase11 labelsNone
Comparative30 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels3
Scale-constrained9 labels2
Negative21 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative105 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Shortlist 3-5: From recent reviews—Bland AI (scalable/high-volume)” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI voice agents · scale prompt · first choice
“Need maximum security/compliance? → Bland AI” Kimi K2 · AI voice agents · comparative prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Bland for the cheapest test” GPT-5.4 mini · AI voice agents · budget prompt · first choice
“Bland AI vertically integrates its own stack, offering flat-rate pricing ... specializes in high-volume calling infrastructure.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI voice agents · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Bland AI if you're not a developer, need reliable support, or care about natural voice quality — the complaints are numerous and consistent.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI voice agents · negative prompt · hard negative
“Bland AI — Caution Advised - Billing complaints are the dominant theme in reviews” Kimi K2 · AI voice agents · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Bland AI unless you have dedicated engineering resources” Kimi K2 · AI voice agents · direct prompt · hard negative
“No public pricing and clear enterprise focus can be a barrier for mid market or smaller teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · AI voice agents · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Bland AI, over the 105 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Bland AI was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Vapi72 of 10513Compare →
PolyAI34 of 1054Not among the top eight
Cognigy21 of 1051Not among the top eight
Goodcall16 of 1054Not among the top eight
ElevenLabs15 of 1050Not among the top eight
Kore.ai9 of 1053Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Bland AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 102 of the 105 answers that named Bland AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

retellai.com80
cloudtalk.io69
bland.aiYour site47
synthflow.ai37
brilo.ai31
lindy.ai29
getvoip.com28
vellum.ai25
deepgram.com22
murf.ai21

342 of the 389 domain citations in answers naming Bland AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

bland.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Bland AI takes 3% of first choices and Retell AI takes 27%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “ai voice agent platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best ai voice agent platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
5,400 a month (“bland ai”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
115 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 11,867 a month
Searches its site ranks for
1,554 · 129 in the top three
Sites linking to it
3,161
Paid Google search
8 searches its ads show for, about 54 clicks and $880 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
66 ads · 43 text, 15 image, 8 video · 21 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2024, as Intelliga Corporation, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 44 in the year, 22 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
3%
rank 5 of 103 in AI voice agents
Segment leader
27%
Retell AI
First choices
7 across its categories
Named in
105 answers
Its own site cited
in 102 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on bland.ai
1,432
subdomains included
Content
483
counted in the table below
Documentation
699
Product · Integration
20 · 19
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog350462026-10-03AI voice agents, CRM
Comparison106192026-09-16AI voice agents
Case study13undated
Glossary or explainer912026-08-11
Template or tool3undated
Webinar or virtual event1undated
Conference or event1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page bland.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Bland AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Bland AI; a claim can dispute any of them.
Bland 2

Follow Bland AI

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Bland AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Bland AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Bland AI by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Bland AI is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Bland AI, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at bland.ai is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.