Every category where a model named Goodcall for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
AI voice agents	Customer	3%	8 of 103	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Retell AI at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Goodcall yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Goodcall across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase5 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained13 labels6

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you're non-technical and just need calls answered affordably: Go with Goodcall” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI voice agents · budget prompt · first choice

“pick Goodcall for the lowest-risk budget choice” Perplexity Sonar · AI voice agents · budget prompt · first choice

“Non-technical small business wanting a fixed monthly cost: Goodcall $79/mo flat” Muse Glimmer 30B · AI voice agents · budget prompt · alternative

“Recommended for small businesses needing a simple AI phone agent” Mistral Small · AI voice agents · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid for Tight Budgets: Flat-rate like Goodcall (~$79/mo)” Grok 4.1 Fast · AI voice agents · budget prompt · hard negative

“Quo or Goodcall can work, but I'd treat them as better fits for lighter-weight use cases” GPT-5.4 mini · AI voice agents · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Goodcall, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Goodcall was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Retell AI24 of 3110Not among the top eight

Vapi17 of 315Not among the top eight

Bland AI16 of 311Not among the top eight

CloudTalk14 of 314Not among the top eight

Synthflow9 of 313Not among the top eight

Synthflow AI6 of 312Not among the top eight

Lindy6 of 310Not among the top eight

Rosie6 of 310Not among the top eight

Rosie AI5 of 311Not among the top eight

Thoughtly5 of 311Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Goodcall. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 31 of the 31 answers that named Goodcall and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudtalk.io27

retellai.com25

lindy.ai17

quo.com17

homebusinessmag.com15

nextiva.com14

synthflow.ai12

brilo.ai10

justcall.io9

zeeg.me9

155 of the 155 domain citations in answers naming Goodcall came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudtalk.io/blog/best-ai-voice-agents20

lindy.ai/blog/ai-voice-agents17

homebusinessmag.com/businesses/ai/best-ai-voice-agent-small-business-10-platforms-ranked-215

quo.com/blog/best-ai-voice-agents15

cloudtalk.io/blog/best-ai-voice-agents-for-automated-inbound-calls13

brilo.ai/resources/best-ai-voice-agent-small-business10

nextiva.com/blog/top-ai-phone-agents.html10

monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/ai-voice-agent-platform8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

goodcall.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Goodcall takes 3% of first choices and Retell AI takes 27%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “ai voice agent platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best ai voice agent platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 1,900 a month (“goodcall”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 9 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 1,057,553 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 23,946 · 121 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,590
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2025, as Digital Funda, verified.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 103 in AI voice agents

Segment leader

27%

Retell AI

First choices: 7 across its categories
Named in: 31 answers
Its own site cited: in 31 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on goodcall.com

1,774

subdomains included

Content

157

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

0 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	71	17	2026-09-22	Scheduling
Comparison	68	4	2026-08-13
Glossary or explainer	7	0	2026-06-26
Case study	5	undated
Report or ebook	2	0	2026-05-13
Template or tool	2	0	2026-06-12
Webinar or virtual event	1	1	2026-07-29
Conference or event	1	0	2026-05-11

Most recent

2026-09-22Ai phone answering email follow up blog
2026-09-16Ai phone assistants protect customer information blog
2026-09-03How ai phone answering helps maintenance and field service businesses blog
2026-09-03Setting up your business for success key legal and operational essentials blog
2026-09-01How ai phone services are transforming spas blog
2026-08-13Ai vs human receptionist when to use each for optimal customer experience comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page goodcall.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as Goodcall

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Goodcall; a claim can dispute any of them.

GoodCall 1

Follow Goodcall

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Goodcall's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Goodcall, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Goodcall by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Goodcall is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Goodcall, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.