GTM AI Index
Index › Vendors › Creatio · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Creatio

23Judge labels
3First choices
1Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
5% in CRM for enterprise buyers
Rank 29 of 71 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 2 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market29 of 71
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise3 of 61
5%17 labels
accepted challenger
In crm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Creatio for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
CRMRevenue operations0%29 of 710%2under 10 labels · led by HubSpot CRM at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Creatio yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Creatio across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Creatio, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Creatio was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Salesforce Sales Cloud18 of 2310Not in the top three
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Sales18 of 232Not in the top three
Zoho CRM13 of 230Not in the top three
HubSpot CRM11 of 230Not in the top three
SugarCRM8 of 230Not in the top three
HubSpot Sales Hub7 of 230Not in the top three
SAP Sales Cloud7 of 230Not in the top three
Freshsales5 of 230Not in the top three
Oracle Sales5 of 230Not in the top three
Pipedrive5 of 230Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Creatio. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 23 answers that named Creatio and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clarity-ventures.com5
ventureharbour.com5
larksuite.com4
nutshell.com4
pipeline.zoominfo.com4
alphabold.com3
articsledge.com3
creatio.comYour site3
monday.com3
salestechspace.com3

Thirty-four of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Creatio came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clarity-ventures.com/ecommerce-integrations/crm-enterprise-solutions-software5
ventureharbour.com/best-enterprise-crm-software-solutions4
articsledge.com/post/enterprise-crm-software3
monday.com/blog/crm-and-sales/crm-software3
salestechspace.com/solutions/crm-lead-management/best-b2b-sales-crms-in-20263
ventureharbour.com/best-crms3
aavishkarit.com/knowledge/best-crm-enterprise2
aavishkarit.com/resources/tco-comparison-guide2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Creatio's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Creatio, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at creatio.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack