Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 of 63, unchanged
2 categories · Named, not rankedCamunda
12Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Camunda was named 4 times in Automation & iPaaS and 1 other category, where Workato led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business42 of 68
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market23 of 67
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise22 of 101
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
In automation & ipaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Camunda for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow automation and iPaaS | GTM data and infrastructure | 0% | 23 of 67 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Workato at 28% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Client onboarding platforms | Customer | 0% | 57 of 104 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Camunda held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Automation & iPaaS · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 18 → 21 of 63
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 21 of 79
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Automation & iPaaS | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 18 → 23 of 67 |
| Client onboarding | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 57 of 104, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Camunda across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Camunda across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Choose Camunda/Temporal if developers need to own the workflow engine.” Perplexity Sonar · Automation & iPaaS · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Camunda, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Camunda was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Camunda, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Camunda was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Camunda. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 12 answers that named Camunda and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
ones.com5
thedigitalprojectmanager.com5
zite.com5
kissflow.com4
betasystems.com3
cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com3
flowforma.com3
informatica.com3
learn.g2.com3
technologyadvice.com3
Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Camunda came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
camunda.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Camunda takes 0% of first choices and Workato takes 28%.ShowHide
Search and answers
camunda.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Camunda takes 0% of first choices and Workato takes 28%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “workflow automation and integration platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best workflow automation and integration platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“camunda”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 237 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 13,960 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,369 · 277 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,195
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 23 of 67 in automation & ipaas
Segment leader
28%
Workato
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 12 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 10 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on camunda.com
3,868
subdomains included
Content
2,937
counted in the table below
Documentation
50
Product · Integration
57 · 208
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,392 | 34 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 1,009 | 0 | 2023-12-01 | CRM | |
| Case study | 330 | undated | |||
| News or press | 102 | 0 | 2014-07-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 46 | 0 | 2024-06-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 29 | 0 | 2024-07-01 | ||
| Podcast or video | 11 | 0 | 2024-03-01 | ||
| Comparison | 10 | 0 | 2024-07-01 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2025-07-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-01Why bolting ai onto legacy workflows fails and what nyc enterprise leaders are doing about it blog
- 2026-09-01Processos momentum across industries blog
- 2026-09-01A simpler more connected camunda experience meet the camundasuccess center blog
- 2026-09-01Stop stitching logs to explain an ai agents decision blog
- 2026-09-01The data says it ai isnt failing you your processes are blog
- 2026-09-01Where ai really creates value and where it doesnt blog
Events in person
Upcoming
- November 9, 2026 to November 12, 2026Gartner IT Symposium/Xpo™ 2026place not stated · takes part
Last twelve months
- October 19, 2026 to October 22, 2026Gartner IT Symposium//Xpo™ Orlando 2026place not stated · attended
- June 25, 2026 to June 26, 2026Reuters: The Future of Insurance 2026place not stated · hosted
As the event pages on camunda.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page camunda.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Camunda
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Camunda.ShowHide
The company
Camunda.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- camunda.com
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The open platform for agentic orchestration
- For
- enterprises
- Price stated
- Start free for development, then run in production — self-managed or in the cloud. camunda.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Try Free camunda.com
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIISO/IEC 27001GDPRTISAXCloud Security Alliance
- Hosting
- EUAWSGoogle CloudAzureOpenShifton-prem
- Customers named
- BarclaysIntuitDeutsche TelekomBT24 Hour FitnessAtlassianathenahealthFirst American
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, integrations
What Camunda's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: camunda.com, camunda.com/pricing, camunda.com/security, camunda.com/platform, camunda.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Camunda's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Camunda, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Camunda by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Camunda is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Camunda, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.