Every category where a model named AskNicely for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer feedback and surveys	Customer	4%	7 of 104	5%	20	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AskNicely yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AskNicely across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	2	0	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	1	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	0	2	2	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase15 labels2

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best balance for most mid-sized B2B teams: AskNicely” GPT-5.4 mini · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd suggest starting with AskNicely or Delighted” MiniMax M2.5 · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“if your company is more service-led and you care most about frontline coaching” Perplexity Sonar · Feedback · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“For Product Teams: Survicate or AskNicely for in-app feedback collection” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Feedback · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid for low budgets: ... AskNicely \u2014 all skew enterprise-priced.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Feedback · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AskNicely, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AskNicely was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Qualtrics27 of 378Not in the top three

SurveyMonkey22 of 372Not in the top three

Survicate21 of 373Not in the top three

Typeform19 of 372Not in the top three

Medallia17 of 375Not in the top three

Delighted17 of 370Not in the top three

SurveySparrow14 of 372Not in the top three

Zonka Feedback11 of 372Not in the top three

CustomerGauge9 of 375Not in the top three

Retently9 of 374Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AskNicely. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 37 answers that named AskNicely and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zonkafeedback.com3

deeto.com2

greatquestion.co2

mopinion.com2

qualaroo.com2

qualtrics.com2

surveysensum.com2

typeform.com2

amplitude.com1

blog.buildbetter.ai1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming AskNicely came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

deeto.com/blog-post/customer-feedback-platforms-compared2

greatquestion.co/blog/customer-feedback-tools2

typeform.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools2

zonkafeedback.com/blog/customer-feedback-tools2

amplitude.com/compare/best-nps-software1

blog.buildbetter.ai/best-customer-feedback-analytics-platforms-ranked1

chattermill.com/blog/best-customer-feedback-tools1

customergauge.com/blog/b2b-nps-benchmarks-tying-revenue-to-your-experience-program1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AskNicely's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AskNicely, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at asknicely.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.