GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › AdRoll · September 2026 Edition
5 categories · Ranked

AdRoll

67Judge labels
18First choices
10Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
5Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in Programmatic for small business buyers
Rank 2 of 96 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 10% of its 10 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In programmatic · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named AdRoll for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Programmatic and display advertisingMarketing13%2 of 9610%10accepted challenger
Search and social advertising platformsMarketing2%23 of 13733%6under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%35 of 1080%2under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Account-based marketing platformsMarketing0%35 of 760%1under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 56%
Ecommerce marketingMarketing0%125 of 154100%1under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Marketing Hub at 36%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AdRoll yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AdRoll across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511002
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash10023
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast11013
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash10012
Llama 4 Maverick02002
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.511002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct10 labels1
Paraphrase7 labels3
Comparative14 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained24 labels14
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 18 of the 23 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best default choice: AdRoll — lowest barrier to entry (no minimum, pay-as-you-go), easy setup, built for small businesses” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Programmatic · budget prompt · first choice
“or AdRoll if you specifically need strong ABM and multi-channel paid media capabilities with simpler setup” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Paid ads · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“AdRoll is a household name for a reason. It is built specifically for growing brands and e-commerce stores.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Programmatic · budget prompt · first choice
“AdRoll edges out for versatility at tiny budgets based on reviews and accessibility.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Programmatic · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Programmatic advertisers frequently warn against AdRoll due to high viewability fraud, bloated fees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · hard negative
“Independent Retargeting Networks (e.g., AdRoll, Criteo) ... The Trap: Inflated/Cooked Attribution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce marketing · negative prompt · hard negative
“More e-commerce/retargeting focused; weaker as a full programmatic DSP” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Programmatic · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“AdRoll if search >50% of budget. ... Weaker on core search (PPC)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Paid ads · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AdRoll, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AdRoll was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Choozle24 of 671Not in the top three
Amazon DSP20 of 670Not in the top three
DV36020 of 670Not in the top three
Google Ads18 of 674Not in the top three
Meta Ads13 of 674Not in the top three
Google Display & Video 36012 of 671Not in the top three
LinkedIn Campaign Manager11 of 672Not in the top three
Vibe.co11 of 672Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AdRoll. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 67 answers that named AdRoll and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adroll.comYour site5
improvado.io5
vibe.co4
adgeeks.agency3
adwave.com3
aidigital.com3
guideflow.com3
heysid.com3
reddit.com3
syntermedia.ai3

Thirty of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming AdRoll came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

The company

AdRoll.
Website
adroll.com
Headquarters
San Francisco, United States
Founded
2007

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AdRoll's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AdRoll, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adroll.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.