| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Programmatic and display advertising | Marketing | 2% | 13 of 92 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 48% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 0% | 112 of 130 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Foursquare Proximity at 15% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Video advertising | Marketing | 0% | 32 of 114 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Native and content advertising | Marketing | 0% | 42 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 41% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximity | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 112 of 130 |
| Programmatic | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 14 → 13 of 92 |
| Video ads | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 17 → 32 of 114 |
| Native ads | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 86, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with Choozle or Simpli.fi if you want true programmatic access” Kimi K2 · Programmatic · budget prompt · first choice
“Known for accessible pricing and no strict minimum budgets, making it suitable for limited budgets.” Mistral Small · Programmatic · budget prompt · alternative
“Simpler self-serve options if you want even lower entry barriers, though less B2B-specialized.” Grok 4.20 · Programmatic · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Simpli.fi excels at geo-targeting, but be prepared for higher minimum spend requirements.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Programmatic · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“lower budget entry barriers than its enterprise-level competitor, Simpli.fi (which often requires $10k–$20k/month minimums)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proximity · direct prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 51 of the 51 answers that named Simpli.fi and are not a share of its labels.
184 of the 184 domain citations in answers naming Simpli.fi came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| News or press | 109 | undated | Programmatic | ||
| Blog | 42 | 5 | 2026-09-14 | ||
| Case study | 32 | 0 | 2026-04-03 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 1 | 2026-07-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 17 | 2 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Comparison | 5 | 0 | 2023-10-10 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-04 | ||
| Podcast or video | 3 | 0 | 2026-04-16 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2024-10-17 |
Every page simpli.fi exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Simpli.fi's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: simpli.fi, trust.simpli.fi, simpli.fi/solutions/simpli-hub, simpli.fi/resources/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Simpli.fi's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Simpli.fi, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Simpli.fi by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: