GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Choozle · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Choozle

38Judge labels
6First choices
5Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
9% in Programmatic for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 96 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 23% of its 13 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In programmatic · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Choozle for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Programmatic and display advertisingMarketing4%4 of 9623%13accepted challenger
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%45 of 1080%1under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Choozle yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Choozle across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash01113
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00011
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00011
Llama 4 Maverick03003
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative4 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained20 labels6
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative38 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Choozle if you want a balance of premium inventory access and manageable minimums” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Programmatic · budget prompt · first choice
“start with AdRoll or Choozle—they're designed for smaller advertisers” MiniMax M2.5 · Programmatic · budget prompt · first choice
“like AdRoll and Choozle, can operate with budgets of a few hundred dollars a month” Llama 4 Maverick · Programmatic · budget prompt · alternative
“Choozle is a simpler, cleaner entry point with controlled inventory” Kimi K2 · Programmatic · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“If your monthly budget is under $2,000, Choozle is no longer the most cost-effective option.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Programmatic · budget prompt · hard negative
“Straightforward self-serve DSP but requires ~$15K/90 days (better at slightly higher budgets)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Programmatic · budget prompt · soft negative
“Good self-serve DSPs (4.6/5 G2), but practical mins ~$5K–$15K/90 days” Grok 4.1 Fast · Programmatic · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Choozle, over the 38 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Choozle was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
StackAdapt34 of 3816Not in the top three
The Trade Desk29 of 381Not in the top three
AdRoll24 of 3811Not in the top three
DV36020 of 380Not in the top three
Amazon DSP16 of 380Not in the top three
Google Ads9 of 381Not in the top three
Demandbase7 of 380Not in the top three
Simpli.fi7 of 380Not in the top three
Vibe.co7 of 380Not in the top three
ad:personam6 of 383Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Choozle. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 38 answers that named Choozle and are not a share of its labels.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Choozle's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Choozle, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at choozle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.