GTM AI Index
Index Marketing SEO › Ubersuggest vs SE Ranking
SEO and content optimization platforms · September 2026 Edition

Ubersuggest vs SE Ranking

Zero of twelve models named Ubersuggest first on the direct prompt; zero named SE Ranking. Ubersuggest was named by nine of the twelve models and SE Ranking by eleven and Ubersuggest carries 15 labels and SE Ranking 24, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Ubersuggest

accepted challenger

By Neil Patel. Named in three categories this edition.

SE Ranking

accepted challenger

United States, founded 2012. Named in three categories this edition.

First-choice share12%6%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate20%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#3#5A position in a field of 16; printed, not drawn.
Labels1524A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Ubersuggest reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Surfer SEO was named alongside these two in ten of the twelve direct answers. Surfer SEO vs Ubersuggest · Surfer SEO vs SE Ranking · Semrush vs Ubersuggest

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SEO and content optimization platforms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
UbersuggestFirst choices, of twelve modelsSE Ranking
Direct00
Paraphrase00
Comparative00
Budget-constrained631 against SE Ranking
Scale-constrained00
Negative003 against Ubersuggest · 1 against SE Ranking
Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

Across every category in the September 2026 Edition, Ubersuggest and SE Ranking were named in the same answer twenty-seven times, of the 40 answers naming Ubersuggest and the 100 naming SE Ranking. In those answers SE Ranking took the first choice nine times and Ubersuggest six.

Every model, every framing

The seventy-two answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Ubersuggest and SE Ranking stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
Ubersuggest SE Ranking first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Ubersuggest on the left and SE Ranking on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Ubersuggest and SE Ranking stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 12 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Sight AI alternatives: Intero Digital, Stratabeat, Ubersuggest, Virayo, Writesonic
Gemini 3.5 FlashSemrush, Surfer SEO alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, SE Ranking
Qwen 3.7 FlashAhrefs, Semrush alternatives: Clearscope, HubSpot, SE Ranking, Screaming Frog, Sitebulb, Surfer SEO

Neither was named

9 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
GPT-5.4 miniSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Conductor
Perplexity SonarSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Surfer SEO
Grok 4.1 FastSurfer SEO alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Frase, MarketMuse, Semrush
Mistral SmallHubSpot Content Hub, HubSpot Marketing Hub alternatives: Clearscope, MarketMuse, Semrush, Surfer SEO
DeepSeek V4 FlashSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Surfer SEO
Llama 4 MaverickKeygrip alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, Screaming Frog, Semrush, Surfer SEO
Kimi K2Semrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, MarketMuse, Screaming Frog, Surfer SEO
GLM 4.7 FlashXSemrush alternatives: Ahrefs, Clearscope, NeuronWriter, Surfer SEO
MiniMax M2.5Surfer SEO alternatives: Ahrefs, MarketMuse

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
SE Ranking leads by eight points.
SE Ranking13%#4 of 13
Ubersuggest6%#7 of 13
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Ubersuggest leads at mid-market.
Ubersuggest12%#3 of 16
SE Ranking6%#5 of 16
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Ubersuggest0%#– of 13
SE Ranking0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Ubersuggest

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of seven in this category shown.

“Ubersuggest | 42/100 (High) | Persistent quality complaints; often criticized for outdated features” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Persistent data quality complaints ... Don't make strategic decisions based on its data alone.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“Persistent quality complaints; data accuracy issues | Moderate” Kimi K2 · negative prompt · soft negative
“I’d pick Ubersuggest for most budget-conscious companies because it gives the broadest useful feature set at a relatively low entry price” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“Ubersuggest stands out as the top overall pick for most small businesses needing both SEO and content optimization under $30/month” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · first choice
“My top recommendation: Start with Ubersuggest ($29/month) if you need keyword research and competitor analysis” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about SE Ranking

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of four in this category shown.

“SE Ranking is solid for agencies and cost-conscious teams, but may fall short for enterprises needing deeper backlink analysis or more advanced SEM integration” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative
“SE Ranking jumped significantly (now ~$103+/mo)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · soft negative
“The best SEO and content optimization platform for a company with a limited budget is SE Ranking, which costs $55/month” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“or SE Ranking ($44/month) if you want a complete SEO platform including content optimization features” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.