Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 104 → 112 of 145
2 categories · Named, not rankedXtremepush
17Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Xtremepush was named 5 times in Proximity and 1 other category, where Foursquare Proximity led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business155 of 158
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market32 of 130
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise11 of 124
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
In proximity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Xtremepush for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Retail, proximity and IoT marketing | Marketing | 0% | 32 of 130 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Foursquare Proximity at 15% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Mobile marketing and push | Marketing | 0% | 74 of 80 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Xtremepush held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Proximity · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 23 → 29 of 120
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 10 of 115, unchanged
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Proximity | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 23 → 32 of 130 |
| Mobile & push | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 74 of 80, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Xtremepush across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Xtremepush across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative3 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“such as *Gimbal (Infillion)*, *Xtremepush*, or *Airship*” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proximity · negative prompt · first choice
“Xtremepush bundles a built-in CDP, geofencing, iBeacon support, and omnichannel messaging into one native platform.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Proximity · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“flagged as slow, not user-friendly, with challenging integrations and no transparent pricing” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile & push · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Xtremepush, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Xtremepush was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Xtremepush, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Xtremepush was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Xtremepush. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 17 answers that named Xtremepush and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
thecmo.com15
g2.com9
gitnux.org9
us.fitgap.com9
worldmetrics.org8
clevertap.com5
radar.com5
sourceforge.net5
clicksgeek.com4
gartner.com4
Seventy-three of the seventy-three domain citations in answers naming Xtremepush came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on xtremepush.com
661
subdomains included
Content
553
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 480 | 17 | 2026-09-18 | CRM, CDP | |
| Case study | 20 | 0 | 2018-06-15 | ||
| Comparison | 19 | 8 | 2026-09-18 | CRM | |
| Conference or event | 10 | 2 | 2026-07-27 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 8 | 2 | 2026-08-07 | CRM | |
| Podcast or video | 6 | 0 | 2023-05-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 5 | 1 | 2026-09-18 | CRM | |
| Report or ebook | 3 | 0 | 2025-12-11 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2020-05-06 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-18Casino loyalty program vs points system comparison
- 2026-09-18Us casino loyalty program checklist template or tool
- 2026-09-18Real time vs batch casino loyalty comparison
- 2026-09-18Do you need casino loyalty program diagnostic guide for us operators blog
- 2026-09-18Choose us casino loyalty software blog
- 2026-09-11Compliant tier programme framework uk casino blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page xtremepush.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name CRM (27); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Xtremepush
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Xtremepush is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Xtremepush is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- CRM and loyalty marketing platform powered by a built-in real-time CDP
- For
- Retention-focused sports betting, gaming, and iGaming operators from startup to enterprise scale
- Certifications
- ISO 27001:2022-accredited ISMS
- Customers named
- Funstage (Greentube-Novomatic)FanDuelFanaticsBetMGMWilliam HillSuperbetKwiffCaliente
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Xtremepush's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: xtremepush.com, xtremepush.com, trust.xtremepush.com, xtremepush.com/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Xtremepush's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Xtremepush, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Xtremepush by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Xtremepush is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Xtremepush, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.