GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Volusion V1 · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Volusion V1

8Judge labels
0First choices
8Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Volusion V1 was named 4 times in Ecommerce, where BigCommerce B2B Edition led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ecommerce · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Volusion V1 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Ecommerce platformsRevenue operations0%96 of 98100%4under 10 labels · led by BigCommerce B2B Edition at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Volusion V1 yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Volusion V1 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative8 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Magento 1.x, Volusion V1, osCommerce, Zen Cart, and outdated PrestaShop versions are flagged as risky” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative
“Outdated, sluggish performance, security risks, no modern integrations” MiniMax M2.5 · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid these platforms entirely: ... Volusion V1” Mistral Small · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative
“Outdated/Obsolete Platforms” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Volusion V1, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Volusion V1 was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Shopify8 of 84Not in the top three
Zen Cart8 of 80Not in the top three
osCommerce8 of 80Not in the top three
BigCommerce7 of 81Not in the top three
Magento 1.x7 of 80Not in the top three
WooCommerce7 of 80Not in the top three
PrestaShop6 of 80Not in the top three
Adobe Commerce3 of 80Not in the top three
Wix3 of 80Not in the top three
Ecwid2 of 80Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Volusion V1. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 8 answers that named Volusion V1 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apparate.com.au1
bigcommerce.com1
blog.shift4shop.com1
blogrecode.com1
deliberatedirections.com1
digitalapplied.com1
ecommerceceo.com1
imakeable.com1
kyanon.digital1
nummbas.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Volusion V1 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Volusion V1's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Volusion V1, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at volusion.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack