GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › osCommerce · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

osCommerce

10Judge labels

0First choices

10Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. osCommerce was named 5 times in Ecommerce, where BigCommerce B2B Edition led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business51 of 56

under the label threshold

Mid-market98 of 98

under the label threshold

Enterprise53 of 58

under the label threshold

In ecommerce · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named osCommerce for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Ecommerce platforms	Revenue operations	0%	98 of 98	100%	5	under 10 labels · led by BigCommerce B2B Edition at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for osCommerce yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated osCommerce across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“flagged as risky because they can lack updates, modern integrations, and strong security support” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative

“Outdated, sluggish performance, security risks, no modern integrations” MiniMax M2.5 · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative

“Why to avoid: They are highly susceptible to security breaches.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid these platforms entirely: ... osCommerce” Mistral Small · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as osCommerce, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and osCommerce was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Shopify10 of 106Not in the top three

BigCommerce9 of 101Not in the top three

Zen Cart9 of 100Not in the top three

Volusion V18 of 100Not in the top three

WooCommerce8 of 100Not in the top three

Magento 1.x7 of 100Not in the top three

PrestaShop6 of 100Not in the top three

Adobe Commerce5 of 100Not in the top three

Squarespace4 of 100Not in the top three

Wix4 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named osCommerce. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 10 answers that named osCommerce and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apparate.com.au1

bigcommerce.com1

blog.shift4shop.com1

blogrecode.com1

deliberatedirections.com1

digitalapplied.com1

ecommerceceo.com1

imakeable.com1

kyanon.digital1

nummbas.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming osCommerce came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

apparate.com.au/blog/ecommerce-platform-dead1

bigcommerce.com/articles/ecommerce/software1

blog.shift4shop.com/discontinued-ecommerce-platforms-how-to-avoid-their-mistakes1

blogrecode.com/best-e-commerce-platforms-for-online-business1

deliberatedirections.com/best-ecommerce-platforms-comparison-current_year1

digitalapplied.com/blog/ecommerce-platform-comparison-2026-complete-matrix1

ecommerceceo.com/ecommerce-platforms1

imakeable.com/en/blog/why-you-shouldnt-rely-on-external-ecommerce-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as osCommerce

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as osCommerce; a claim can dispute any of them.

OSCommerce 1

The company

OsCommerce is the company behind osCommerce.

Website: oscommerce.com
Founded: 2000

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when osCommerce's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as osCommerce, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oscommerce.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.