Index › Vendors › Magento 1.x · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Magento 1.x

7Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Magento 1.x was named 4 times in Ecommerce, where BigCommerce B2B Edition led with 27%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business48 of 56

under the label threshold

Mid-market94 of 98

under the label threshold

Enterprise45 of 58

under the label threshold

In ecommerce · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Magento 1.x for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Ecommerce platforms	Revenue operations	0%	94 of 98	100%	4	under 10 labels · led by BigCommerce B2B Edition at 27%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Magento 1.x yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Magento 1.x across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“legacy systems like Magento 1.x, Volusion V1, osCommerce, Zen Cart, and older PrestaShop installs, which are described as having weaker support, security” Perplexity Sonar · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative

“Official support ended in June 2020. Security vulnerabilities, poor performance” MiniMax M2.5 · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative

“Official support ended in June 2020; no security patches since then” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative

“Avoid these platforms entirely: Magento 1.x (definitely)” Mistral Small · Ecommerce · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Magento 1.x, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Magento 1.x was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Shopify7 of 73Not in the top three

Volusion V17 of 70Not in the top three

Zen Cart7 of 70Not in the top three

osCommerce7 of 70Not in the top three

BigCommerce6 of 70Not in the top three

WooCommerce6 of 70Not in the top three

PrestaShop5 of 70Not in the top three

Adobe Commerce2 of 70Not in the top three

Squarespace2 of 70Not in the top three

Squarespace Commerce2 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Magento 1.x. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 7 answers that named Magento 1.x and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

apparate.com.au1

bigcommerce.com1

blog.shift4shop.com1

blogrecode.com1

deliberatedirections.com1

digitalapplied.com1

ecommerceceo.com1

imakeable.com1

kyanon.digital1

nummbas.com1

No domain is on file for Magento 1.x, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

apparate.com.au/blog/ecommerce-platform-dead1

bigcommerce.com/articles/ecommerce/software1

blog.shift4shop.com/discontinued-ecommerce-platforms-how-to-avoid-their-mistakes1

blogrecode.com/best-e-commerce-platforms-for-online-business1

deliberatedirections.com/best-ecommerce-platforms-comparison-current_year1

digitalapplied.com/blog/ecommerce-platform-comparison-2026-complete-matrix1

ecommerceceo.com/ecommerce-platforms1

imakeable.com/en/blog/why-you-shouldnt-rely-on-external-ecommerce-platforms1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Magento 1.x

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Magento 1.x; a claim can dispute any of them.

Magento 1.x (Adobe Commerce) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Magento 1.x's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Magento 1.x, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.