GTM AI Index

Index › Products › Visitor Queue · October 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

Visitor Queue

14Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

8 / 14Models named it

3Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

6 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Visitor Queue was named 6 times in Web analytics and 2 other categories, where Google Analytics 4 led with 57%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market14 of 91

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In web analytics · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Visitor Queue for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Web analytics	GTM data and infrastructure	2%	14 of 91	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Google Analytics 4 at 57%
Identity resolution	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	57 of 140	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution at 12%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Session replay and heatmaps	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	37 of 56	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Clarity at 33%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Visitor Queue yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Visitor Queue across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labels3

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Visitor Queue and Mixpanel are the top choices” Mistral Small · Web analytics · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“identifies companies visiting your website and provides contact information for outreach, designed specifically for smaller businesses” Llama 4 Maverick · Web analytics · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“pair with Visitor Queue, Whoisvisiting, or Leadfeeder (now Dealfront)” Grok 4.20 · Session replay · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“RB2B or Visitor Queue (Best for IP-to-Account Matching on Budget)” Grok 4.20 · Identity · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Visitor Queue, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Visitor Queue was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Dealfront9 of 140Not among the top eight

Google Analytics 47 of 143Not among the top eight

6sense5 of 140Not among the top eight

Hotjar4 of 140Not among the top eight

Microsoft Clarity3 of 143Not among the top eight

RB2B3 of 141Not among the top eight

Hightouch Adaptive Identity Resolution3 of 140Not among the top eight

Lead Forensics3 of 140Not among the top eight

Prospeo2 of 142Not among the top eight

CustomerLabs 1PD Ops2 of 141Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Visitor Queue. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Visitor Queue and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cometly.com9

pipeline.zoominfo.com9

pipelineon.com7

factors.ai6

checkthat.ai5

prospeo.io5

rb2b.com5

softwaresuggest.com5

sourceforge.net5

knock-ai.com4

Sixty of the sixty domain citations in answers naming Visitor Queue came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cometly.com/post/best-visitor-tracking-software-20269

pipeline.zoominfo.com/marketing/website-visitor-tracking-tools8

pipelineon.com/blog/identity-resolution-compared5

rb2b.com/learn/website-visitor-tracking-software5

softwaresuggest.com/identity-resolution-software5

checkthat.ai/answers/what-are-the-best-identity-resolution-tools4

factors.ai/blog/free-website-traffic-analysis-tools4

knock-ai.com/blog/best-b2b-website-visitor-identification-software-and-tools4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on leadinfo.com

3,168

subdomains included

Content

249

counted in the table below

Documentation

334

Product · Integration

9 · 148

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	150	17	2026-10-01	CRM, ABM
Case study	38	1	2026-07-31
Comparison	27	3	2026-09-14
Glossary or explainer	21	1	2026-09-08	ABM
Template or tool	8	0	2025-12-04
Webinar or virtual event	4	undated
Conference or event	1	0	2026-03-13

Most recent

2026-10-01Retarget website visitors on linkedin blog
2026-09-30Identify website visitors from ip address to company name blog
2026-09-21Who is visiting my website how to identify the companies behind your traffic blog
2026-09-18Identify website visitors and convert them to leads five step playbook blog
2026-09-18Best lead intelligence platforms for b2b sales teams 2026 blog
2026-09-17Website visitor identification market leaders 2026 blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page leadinfo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Visitor Queue

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Visitor Queue is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Price stated: Annual Monthly leadinfo.com/en/solutions
Starting price: 49 leadinfo.com/en/solutions
Free plan or trial: Start Free Trial leadinfo.com
Integrations claimed: 70 leadinfo.com · 67 leadinfo.com/en/pricing pages disagree
Certifications: GDPR-compliantISO 27001 Certified100% GDPR-compliant100% GDPR compliant
Customers named: Reason Online MarketingReasonINSYS icomMultinet UpCompanywebB&G HekwerkRionedGBT Opleidingen
Not stated on the pages read: Positioning, who it is for, hosting

What Visitor Queue's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: leadinfo.com, leadinfo.com/en/pricing, leadinfo.com/en/solutions, leadinfo.com/en/customers, leadinfo.com/en/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Visitor Queue's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Visitor Queue, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Visitor Queue by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Visitor Queue is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Visitor Queue, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.