Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 22 of 71
1 category · Named, not rankedUserled
9Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
8 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Userled was named 5 times in ABM, where AdRoll ABM led with 53%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business22 of 74
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market22 of 71
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise35 of 46
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In abm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Userled for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Account-based marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 22 of 71 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by AdRoll ABM at 53% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Userled held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ABM · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 30 → 25 of 64
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 35 → 33 of 44
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ABM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 22 of 71 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Userled across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Userled across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Userled \u2013 mid-market execution alternative to enterprise suites” Muse Glimmer 30B · ABM · direct prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Userled, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Userled was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Userled, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Userled was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Userled. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 9 of the 9 answers that named Userled and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
guideflow.com6
abmatic.ai5
userled.ioYour site5
thecmo.com4
tomba.io4
blog.hubspot.com3
cleverly.co3
learn.g2.com3
lusha.com3
mysmartmedia.com3
Thirty-four of the thirty-nine domain citations in answers naming Userled came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on userled.io
659
subdomains included
Content
265
counted in the table below
Documentation
131
Product · Integration
7 · 38
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 169 | 0 | 2026-06-03 | ABM, CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 39 | 29 | 2026-09-25 | ABM, CRM | |
| Case study | 18 | undated | ABM | ||
| Report or ebook | 17 | undated | ABM, CRM | ||
| Comparison | 13 | undated | ABM | ||
| Template or tool | 6 | undated | ABM | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | undated | ABM | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-251 to 1 abm glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-25Abm landing page glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-25Abm lite glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-25Abm metrics glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-25Abm microsite glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-25Abm plays glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page userled.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Userled
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Userled is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Userled is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI + ABM Activation Platform that enables B2B companies to run full-funnel account-based marketing campaigns across every channel and touchpoint with real-time sales insights.
- For
- B2B companies
- Price stated
- Module-based pricing with unlimited seats and accounts: LinkedIn ABM Ads from $2,000/month, Microsites from $2,000/month, Sales Plugin from $599/month for 10 seats. userled.io
- Starting price
- 599 userled.io
- Integrations claimed
- 8 userled.io
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type IIGDPR & CCPASSO & SCIM
- Hosting
- EU (AWS eu-west-2) / US (AWS us-east-1)EU / USUSAEUUS
- Customers named
- CanvaKplercommercetoolsElasticFingerprintSquareNinjaOneIntentsify
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial
What Userled's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: userled.io, userled.io/pricing, trust.userled.io, userled.io/platform, userled.io/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Userled's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Userled, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Userled by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Userled is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Userled, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.