Every category where a model named Influ2 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Account-based marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	17 of 76	0%	11	accepted challenger
Search and social advertising platforms	Marketing	0%	38 of 137	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 10%
Programmatic and display advertising	Marketing	0%	53 of 96	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 61%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Influ2 yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Influ2 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	1	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	2
Mistral Small	0	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase3 labelsNone

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative29 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Influ2 if you have a very narrow list of high-value prospects” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ABM · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best for Hyper-Targeted, Sales-Aligned B2B Ads: Influ2” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paid ads · direct prompt · alternative

“Influ2 - Contact-Level ABM” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paid ads · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Influ2, over the 29 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Influ2 was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Demandbase25 of 2911Not in the top three

6sense25 of 298Not in the top three

AdRoll ABM22 of 292Not in the top three

Madison Logic12 of 290Not in the top three

Terminus11 of 290Not in the top three

Mutiny10 of 290Not in the top three

ZoomInfo Marketing10 of 290Not in the top three

HubSpot ABM8 of 291Not in the top three

Bombora8 of 290Not in the top three

Foundry ABM8 of 290Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Influ2. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 29 answers that named Influ2 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

6sense.com1

abmatic.ai1

adroll.com1

cience.com1

cleverly.co1

demandbase.com1

devopsschool.com1

ecosystem.hubspot.com1

g2.com1

gartner.com1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming Influ2 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

6sense.com/blog/best-account-based-marketing-platforms1

abmatic.ai/blog/best-account-based-marketing-tools-20261

adroll.com/blog/best-abm-platforms-comparison1

cience.com/blog/account-based-marketing-tools1

cleverly.co/blog/account-based-marketing-tools1

demandbase.com/blog/account-based-marketing-solutions1

devopsschool.com/blog/top-10-account-based-marketing-abm-platforms-features-pros-cons-comp1

ecosystem.hubspot.com/marketplace/apps/abm1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Influ2's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Influ2, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at influ2.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.