GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Talkwalker Alerts · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Talkwalker Alerts

10Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

7 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Talkwalker Alerts was named 7 times in PR, where Muck Rack led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business20 of 67

under the label threshold

Mid-market15 of 65

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In pr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Talkwalker Alerts for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
PR and media monitoring	Marketing	0%	15 of 65	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Muck Rack at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Talkwalker Alerts yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Talkwalker Alerts across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	2
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Talkwalker Alerts if you have a $0 budget but still want reliable, automated web alerts.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PR · budget prompt · alternative

“Google Alerts and Talkwalker Alerts are completely free options and a reasonable starting point” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PR · budget prompt · alternative

“Better than Google Alerts but still free” Mistral Small · PR · budget prompt · alternative

“Free backup for web/news.” Grok 4.1 Fast · PR · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Talkwalker Alerts, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Talkwalker Alerts was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Brand2410 of 101Not in the top three

Google Alerts10 of 100Not in the top three

Mention9 of 101Not in the top three

Awario7 of 107Not in the top three

Cision5 of 100Not in the top three

Meltwater5 of 100Not in the top three

Semrush AI PR Toolkit5 of 100Not in the top three

Muck Rack4 of 100Not in the top three

BrandMentions3 of 100Not in the top three

Sprout Social3 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Talkwalker Alerts. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 10 answers that named Talkwalker Alerts and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

brand24.com1

guideflow.com1

newsdata.io1

prlab.co1

reachreport.io1

shadow.inc1

truescope.com1

Seven of the seven domain citations in answers naming Talkwalker Alerts came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

brand24.com/blog/media-monitoring-tools1

guideflow.com/blog/media-monitoring-software1

newsdata.io/blog/media-monitoring-tools1

prlab.co/blog/the-best-media-monitoring-tools-for-news-and-social-media1

reachreport.io/en/guide/media-monitoring-tools-for-pr1

shadow.inc/resources/best-media-monitoring-tools-pr-agencies1

truescope.com/blog/top-pr-monitoring-tools-a-comprehensive-review1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Talkwalker Alerts's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Talkwalker Alerts, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at talkwalker.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.