Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 17 → 14 of 37
1 category · Named, not rankedSocialBee
16Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SocialBee was named 8 times in Social media, where Sprout Social led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business14 of 38
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market18 of 53
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In social media · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SocialBee for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social media management | Marketing | 0% | 18 of 53 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 30% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SocialBee held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Social media · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 15 → 17 of 51
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Social media | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 18 of 53 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SocialBee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SocialBee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“SocialBee is highly budget-friendly because it allows you to recycle evergreen content” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Social media · budget prompt · alternative
“Content categorization and recycling” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Social media · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Some users report lack of transparency, poor communication, and inconsistent pricing approaches” MiniMax M2.5 · Social media · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SocialBee, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SocialBee was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SocialBee, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SocialBee was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SocialBee. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 16 answers that named SocialBee and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com9
buffer.com8
make.com8
learn.g2.com7
napoleoncat.com7
saascompared.io7
capterra.com5
planable.io5
postiv.ai5
socialbee.comYour site5
Sixty-one of the sixty-six domain citations in answers naming SocialBee came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
socialbee.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SocialBee takes 0% of first choices and Sprout Social takes 30%.ShowHide
Search and answers
socialbee.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SocialBee takes 0% of first choices and Sprout Social takes 30%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “social media management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best social media management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“socialbee”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 100 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 136,844 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 22,920 · 672 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 7,934
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 18 of 53 in social media
Segment leader
30%
Sprout Social
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 16 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on socialbee.com
1,793
subdomains included
Content
855
counted in the table below
Documentation
181
Product · Integration
0 · 3
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 524 | 5 | 2026-09-29 | Social media, SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 213 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | SEO, Social media | |
| Report or ebook | 64 | 3 | 2026-09-03 | SEO | |
| Comparison | 43 | 3 | 2026-09-10 | Social media | |
| Template or tool | 6 | 0 | 2025-10-02 | ||
| Case study | 2 | 0 | 2022-10-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2024-11-01 | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2024-06-19 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-29Content blog
- 2026-09-29Social media blog
- 2026-09-28Marketing blog
- 2026-09-22X twitter blog
- 2026-09-10Compare instagram scheduling tools comparison
- 2026-09-10Analytics blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page socialbee.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow SocialBee
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SocialBee is its own company.ShowHide
The company
SocialBee is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- AI-powered all-in-one social media management tool
- For
- creators, small businesses, marketers, agencies, solopreneurs, teams, and organizations
- Price stated
- Bootstrap $29/month; Accelerate $49/month; Pro $99/month; Pro50 $179/month; Pro100 $329/month; Pro150 $449/month socialbee.com
- Starting price
- 29 socialbee.com
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial; no credit card required socialbee.com
- Integrations claimed
- 10 socialbee.com/pricing
- Customers named
- RogerMadeitHum JAM5000fish, Inc.Skyline Insurance AgencyDouglasville First United Methodist ChurchConscious Trader Heavenly HimalayanThe Teen Life Coach
- Not stated on the pages read
- Certifications, hosting
What SocialBee's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: socialbee.com, socialbee.com/pricing, socialbee.com/features, socialbee.com/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SocialBee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SocialBee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SocialBee by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SocialBee is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SocialBee, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.