Every category where a model named SocialBee for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Social media management	Marketing	0%	15 of 59	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by Sprout Social at 37%
Content marketing platforms	Marketing	0%	74 of 159	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SocialBee yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SocialBee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained10 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“SocialBee or PostEverywhere at $20-29/month provide excellent value” Mistral Small · Social media · budget prompt · alternative

“upgrade to SocialBee (~$25/mo) if you need more automation features” MiniMax M2.5 · Social media · budget prompt · alternative

“SocialBee: slightly better if you want to recycle old content.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Content marketing · budget prompt · alternative

“Content recycling (evergreen strategy) \u2192 SocialBee” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Social media · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Poor customer support: Delayed responses, generic/scripted replies, billing friction reported” Kimi K2 · Social media · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SocialBee, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SocialBee was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Buffer21 of 2410Not in the top three

Metricool17 of 244Not in the top three

Later16 of 240Not in the top three

Sprout Social15 of 241Not in the top three

Hootsuite13 of 241Not in the top three

Zoho Social13 of 240Not in the top three

Agorapulse10 of 240Not in the top three

Sendible10 of 240Not in the top three

Publer Professional6 of 241Not in the top three

SocialPilot6 of 240Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SocialBee. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 24 answers that named SocialBee and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

socialbee.comYour site3

blog.hubspot.com2

napoleoncat.com2

posteverywhere.ai2

zapier.com2

adwave.com1

agencypartner.com1

benchmarkemail.com1

blog.hootsuite.com1

buffer.com1

Thirteen of the sixteen domain citations in answers naming SocialBee came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

zapier.com/blog/best-social-media-management-tools2

adwave.com/resources/best-social-media-scheduling-tools-for-small-business1

agencypartner.com/top-10-affordable-digital-marketing-tools-for-small-businesses1

benchmarkemail.com/blog/small-business-marketing-tools1

blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-management-tools1

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/best-social-media-management-tools1

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/social-media-scheduler1

buffer.com/resources/best-social-media-management-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SocialBee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SocialBee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at socialbee.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.