Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 7 → 17 of 48
1 category · Named, not rankedSmartReach.io
13Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SmartReach.io was named 6 times in Sales engagement, where Apollo.io led with 35%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business18 of 49
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market7 of 66
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise35 of 45
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In sales engagement · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named SmartReach.io for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement platforms | Sales | 2% | 7 of 66 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 35% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, SmartReach.io held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales engagement · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 19 → 7 of 62
Enterprise▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 9 → 37 of 45
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales engagement | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 19 → 7 of 66 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated SmartReach.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated SmartReach.io across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best Overall Value (Flat-Rate Pricing): SmartReach.io ... widely considered the best value for lean teams” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Sales engagement · budget prompt · first choice
“For SMBs: Clay, SmartReach, or Woodpecker (better deliverability, transparent pricing)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Sales engagement · negative prompt · alternative
“Entry-level (SMBs): $29–$45/user/month (SmartReach, Close, HubSpot Sales Hub).” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Multichannel Outreach ... Affordable multichannel at budget price” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales engagement · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SmartReach.io, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SmartReach.io was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as SmartReach.io, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SmartReach.io was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SmartReach.io. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named SmartReach.io and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com9
cloudtalk.io9
unifygtm.com8
connectsafely.ai7
artisan.co6
pipeline.zoominfo.com6
apollo.io5
g2.com5
klenty.com5
lagrowthmachine.com5
Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming SmartReach.io came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
smartreach.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SmartReach.io takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.ShowHide
Search and answers
smartreach.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, SmartReach.io takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 35%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales engagement platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 40 a month (“smartreach.io”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 42,870 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 6,166 · 6 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,201
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 7 of 66 in sales engagement
Segment leader
35%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 13 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 13 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on smartreach.io
822
subdomains included
Content
505
counted in the table below
Documentation
233
Product · Integration
7 · 14
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 402 | 12 | 2026-09-28 | CRM, Email verification | |
| Comparison | 60 | 23 | 2026-09-27 | Email verification, CRM | |
| Template or tool | 18 | 14 | 2026-09-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 0 | 2025-05-28 | ||
| Case study | 9 | 0 | 2026-06-26 | ||
| Report or ebook | 3 | 2 | 2026-08-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2025-11-25 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Saleshandy review blog
- 2026-09-27Saleshandy vs lusha comparison
- 2026-09-26Saleshandy vs dripify comparison
- 2026-09-25Saleshandy vs smartlead comparison
- 2026-09-24Mailshake vs saleshandy comparison
- 2026-09-23Reply io review blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page smartreach.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as SmartReach.io
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SmartReach.io; a claim can dispute any of them.
SmartReach 2
Follow SmartReach.io
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
SmartReach.io.ShowHide
The company
SmartReach.io.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- smartreach.io
- Headquarters
- Hyderabad, India
- Founded
- 2016
- Employees
- about 21 (2026)
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cold email software with multichannel outreach
- For
- B2B sales teams, agencies, and recruiters
- Price stated
- from $29 per month smartreach.io
- Starting price
- 29 smartreach.io
- Free plan or trial
- 14-day free trial with 200 prospects included and no credit card at signup smartreach.io
- Integrations claimed
- 8000 smartreach.io
- Certifications
- GDPR compliant
- Customers named
- FlyTechRemoteForceSalesCOROnRamp DataColdlyticsChicago Pacific FoundersSales CORTerraboost Media
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What SmartReach.io's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: smartreach.io, smartreach.io/pricing, trust.smartreach.io, smartreach.io/features, smartreach.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SmartReach.io's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SmartReach.io, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for SmartReach.io by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where SmartReach.io is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name SmartReach.io, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.