GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Skyword Accelerator360 · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Skyword Accelerator360

17Judge labels
0First choices
0Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Content marketing for enterprise buyers
Rank 30 of 159 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 5 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In content marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Skyword Accelerator360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Content marketing platformsMarketing0%30 of 1590%5under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Skyword Accelerator360 yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Skyword Accelerator360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small01001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you struggle with writer quality or scaling production: Look at Skyword or Contently.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“best when content production capacity is the main need” GPT-5.4 mini · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Combines software with managed content services” Mistral Small · Content marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Skyword Accelerator360, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Skyword Accelerator360 was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Optimizely CMP15 of 171Not in the top three
Adobe GenStudio14 of 170Not in the top three
HubSpot Content Hub10 of 175Not in the top three
Contently8 of 170Not in the top three
CoSchedule5 of 170Not in the top three
Seismic4 of 170Not in the top three
Aprimo3 of 171Not in the top three
HubSpot Marketing Hub3 of 171Not in the top three
HubSpot for Marketers3 of 171Not in the top three
Semrush3 of 171Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Skyword Accelerator360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 17 answers that named Skyword Accelerator360 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hubspot.com3
gartner.com2
hubspot.com2
improvado.io2
trysight.ai2
wifitalents.com2
worldmetrics.org2
zipdo.co2
aigrowthagent.co1
blog.aigrowthagent.co1

Nineteen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming Skyword Accelerator360 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Skyword Accelerator360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Skyword Accelerator360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at skyword.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack