Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 68 of 120, unchanged
3 categories · RankedSitecore Content Hub
17Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Content marketing for enterprise buyers
Rank 70 of 124 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market70 of 124
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Sitecore Content Hub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 70 of 124 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Content marketing platforms | Marketing | 0% | 103 of 135 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Content Hub at 33% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Digital asset management | Marketing | 0% | 55 of 70 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Canto at 45% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Sitecore Content Hub held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Channel marketing · by segment
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 70 of 124, unchanged |
| Content marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 96 → 103 of 135 |
| DAM | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 46 → 55 of 70 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Sitecore Content Hub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Sitecore Content Hub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Use a specialized TCM platform (like Sitecore Content Hub or modern cloud alternatives) for *content*” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Channel marketing · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sitecore Content Hub, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sitecore Content Hub was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Sitecore Content Hub, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sitecore Content Hub was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sitecore Content Hub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 17 answers that named Sitecore Content Hub and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
blog.hubspot.com8
gartner.com7
aprimo.com6
trysight.ai6
checkthat.ai5
g2.com5
optimizely.com5
bynder.com4
learn.g2.com4
sitecore.comYour site4
Fifty of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Sitecore Content Hub came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
sitecore.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sitecore Content Hub takes 0% of first choices and Channelscaler takes 10%.ShowHide
Search and answers
sitecore.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Sitecore Content Hub takes 0% of first choices and Channelscaler takes 10%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “through-channel marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best through-channel marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 140 a month (“sitecore content hub”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 32,655 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,632 · 519 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 9,486
- Paid Google search
- 8 searches its ads show for, about 16 clicks and $109 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 70 of 124 in channel marketing
Segment leader
10%
Channelscaler
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 17 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 16 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on sitecore.com
6,319
subdomains included
Content
817
counted in the table below
Documentation
2
Product · Integration
90 · 403
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 409 | 14 | 2026-09-28 | CDP, DAM | |
| Case study | 120 | 3 | 2026-09-04 | ||
| News or press | 114 | 3 | 2026-08-01 | DAM, CDP | |
| Glossary or explainer | 86 | 1 | 2026-08-21 | Content marketing, ABM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 58 | 9 | 2026-11-01 | DAM, SEO | |
| Comparison | 14 | 0 | 2026-04-02 | CDP, CRM | |
| Report or ebook | 12 | 0 | 2026-03-30 | DAM | |
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2023-08-02 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 0001-01-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-11-01Symposium 2026 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-01Ai visibility to action webinar or virtual event
- 2026-10-01Sitecore at henry stewart dam new york 2026 webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28Uae digital authenticity ai blog
- 2026-09-23Measure improve digital authenticity blog
- 2026-09-07Ai transparency readiness blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page sitecore.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Sitecore Content Hub
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sitecore Content Hub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sitecore Content Hub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sitecore Content Hub by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Sitecore Content Hub is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sitecore Content Hub, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.