GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Sakari · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Sakari

5Judge labels

1First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Sakari was named 2 times in Mobile & push, where OneSignal led with 34%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business11 of 68

under the label threshold

Mid-market30 of 75

under the label threshold

Enterprise33 of 111

under the label threshold

In mobile & push · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sakari for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	0%	30 of 75	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sakari yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sakari across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Sakari if you care most about two-way conversations, automation, CRM integration, but push is not clearly emphasized” Perplexity Sonar · Mobile & push · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sakari, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sakari was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OneSignal5 of 51Not in the top three

Salesmsg3 of 50Not in the top three

Braze2 of 52Not in the top three

Customer.io2 of 51Not in the top three

TextUs2 of 51Not in the top three

Airship1 of 51Not in the top three

Staffbase1 of 51Not in the top three

Workshop1 of 51Not in the top three

ActiveCampaign1 of 50Not in the top three

AlertMedia1 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sakari. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 5 answers that named Sakari and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

attentive.com2

constantcontact.com2

customerthink.com2

getvero.com2

insiderone.com2

klaviyo.com2

learn.g2.com2

mobile-text-alerts.com2

sakari.ioYour site2

salesmessage.com2

Eighteen of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Sakari came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

attentive.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms2

constantcontact.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platform2

customerthink.com/the-top-7-sms-marketing-platforms-for-20262

getvero.com/resources/top-6-sms-marketing-platforms-for-b2b-in-20262

insiderone.com/best-email-and-sms-marketing-software2

klaviyo.com/blog/best-sms-marketing-platforms2

learn.g2.com/best-sms-marketing-software2

mobile-text-alerts.com/articles/plug-and-play-sms-b2b2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sakari's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sakari, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sakari.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.