GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › RichAds · September 2026 Edition

3 categories · Named, not ranked

RichAds

10Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

3Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. RichAds was named 5 times in Native ads and 2 other categories, where StackAdapt led with 23%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business56 of 59

under the label threshold

Mid-market72 of 72

under the label threshold

Enterprise76 of 77

under the label threshold

In native ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named RichAds for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Native and content advertising	Marketing	0%	72 of 72	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 23%
Mobile marketing and push	Marketing	0%	73 of 75	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by OneSignal at 34%
Video advertising	Marketing	0%	91 of 121	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RichAds yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RichAds across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative7 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Push Notification Ad Networks to Avoid ... fake bot traffic, zero engagement, and refusal to refund” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Mobile & push · negative prompt · hard negative

“Verdict: Avoid unless you have sophisticated fraud detection and a high tolerance for waste.” Kimi K2 · Native ads · negative prompt · hard negative

“Advertisers report ~99% fraudulent clicks with virtually no real traffic or conversions” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Native ads · negative prompt · hard negative

“grouped with MGID in that same "affiliate & volume networks" tier ... comes with the same bot/remnant-inventory risk” Perplexity Sonar · Native ads · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RichAds, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RichAds was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

StackAdapt6 of 102Not in the top three

MGID5 of 100Not in the top three

Revcontent5 of 100Not in the top three

Taboola5 of 100Not in the top three

Teads5 of 100Not in the top three

Nativo4 of 101Not in the top three

TripleLift4 of 101Not in the top three

Sharethrough2 of 101Not in the top three

Vibe.co2 of 101Not in the top three

AdLib2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RichAds. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 10 answers that named RichAds and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

adcash.com1

ads.life360.com1

aidigital.com1

blog.hubspot.com1

clicksgeek.com1

en.trafficcardinal.com1

en.wikipedia.org1

epom.com1

fastercapital.com1

ftc.gov1

Ten of the ten domain citations in answers naming RichAds came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

adcash.com/knowledge/native-ad-networks-for-advertisers1

ads.life360.com/newsroom/the-top-native-advertising-platforms-that-advertisers-and-publish1

aidigital.com/blog/native-advertising-platforms1

blog.hubspot.com/marketing/native-advertising-rises-as-consumers-opt-out1

clicksgeek.com/best-paid-advertising-platforms-for-businesses1

en.trafficcardinal.com/post/best-native-advertising-networks1

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Native_advertising1

epom.com/blog/dsp/buy-native-ads-traffic1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as RichAds

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RichAds; a claim can dispute any of them.

RichAds (RichPush) 1

The company

Richads is the company behind RichAds.

Website: richads.com
Headquarters: Cyprus

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RichAds's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RichAds, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at richads.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.