Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 55 → 61 of 61
3 categories · Named, not rankedRichAds
14Judge labels
0First choices
10Negative labels
7 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
8 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. RichAds was named 8 times in Native ads and 2 other categories, where StackAdapt led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business65 of 65
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market86 of 86
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise79 of 79
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
In native ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named RichAds for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native and content advertising | Marketing | 0% | 86 of 86 | 100% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 41% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Programmatic and display advertising | Marketing | 0% | 33 of 92 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 48% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Video advertising | Marketing | 0% | 31 of 114 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by StackAdapt at 32% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, RichAds held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Native ads · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 69 → 79 of 79
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 75 → 65 of 65
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Native ads | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 69 → 86 of 86 |
| Programmatic | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 33 of 92, unchanged |
| Video ads | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 83 → 31 of 114 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated RichAds across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated RichAds across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for performance/affiliate traffic: PropellerAds, RichAds, Adsterra, or ExoClick[4]” Perplexity Sonar · Programmatic · comparative prompt · alternative
“launch pre-roll video ads starting from $0.05 CPM” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Video ads · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Multiple Trustpilot complaints label traffic as "fraudulent" with bot clicks, zero real engagement” Grok 4.20 · Native ads · negative prompt · hard negative
“Page Hijacking & Malware ... these networks' scripts bypass safety settings” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Native ads · negative prompt · hard negative
“Multiple reports of fake traffic” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Native ads · negative prompt · hard negative
“such as MGID and RichAds: These are not automatically bad, but sources note they can need substantial filtering to avoid invalid traffic” Perplexity Sonar · Native ads · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RichAds, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RichAds was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as RichAds, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RichAds was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RichAds. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named RichAds and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
aidigital.com8
admetrics.io6
g2.com6
madgicx.com6
trustpilot.com6
epom.com5
joinative.com5
mobidea.com5
reddit.com5
richads.comYour site5
Fifty-two of the fifty-seven domain citations in answers naming RichAds came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on richads.com
1,789
subdomains included
Content
1,377
counted in the table below
Documentation
10
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 1,203 | 25 | 2026-09-28 | Video ads, SEO | |
| Glossary or explainer | 105 | 2 | 2026-09-01 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 20 | 0 | 2023-12-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 18 | 0 | 2026-02-10 | ||
| Comparison | 13 | 4 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Case study | 10 | 0 | 2026-04-13 | ||
| Report or ebook | 7 | 0 | 2022-03-14 | ||
| Podcast or video | 1 | 0 | 2024-02-15 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Video ads key markets blog
- 2026-09-25Top online casino brands brazil blog
- 2026-09-25Retargeting richads blog
- 2026-09-24Retargeting blog
- 2026-09-23How to buy traffic for asia blog
- 2026-09-18Online video ads performance blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page richads.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow RichAds
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Richads is the company behind RichAds.ShowHide
The company
Richads is the company behind RichAds.
ShowHideOn record
Wikidata- Website
- richads.com
- Headquarters
- Cyprus
Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Trusted performance ad network
- For
- affiliates, agencies, and marketers
- Price stated
- RichAds advertising network offers access to all platform functionality after a $150 deposit. richads.com
- Starting price
- $150 richads.com
- Integrations claimed
- 18 richads.com
- Certifications
- Adscore
- Not stated on the pages read
- Free plan or trial, hosting, customers
What RichAds's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: richads.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RichAds's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RichAds, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RichAds by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where RichAds is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name RichAds, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.