Every category where a model named PostBeyond for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee advocacy platforms	Marketing	4%	8 of 64	36%	14	criticized challenger
Loyalty, advocacy and referrals	Marketing	0%	84 of 110	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 26%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PostBeyond yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PostBeyond across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	1	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.20	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase2 labels1

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained9 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best described as the simplicity play for mid-market B2B teams that want a clean, simple advocacy tool without the complexity of enterprise platforms” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee advocacy · direct prompt · first choice

“I would recommend using PostBeyond (by Influitive) as a tool for employees to share company content on social media” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee advocacy · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“platforms that have been criticized for turning employees into unpaid marketing channels on their personal accounts include PostBeyond, Sprout Social, EveryoneSocial, DSMN8, Bambu, and Hootsuite Amplify” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee advocacy · negative prompt · hard negative

“Sociabble/PostBeyond/EveryoneSocial: Quote-based, generally enterprise pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee advocacy · budget prompt · hard negative

“Has limited support for employee-generated content, remains largely top-down and distribution-focused” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee advocacy · negative prompt · soft negative

“If you don't already use Influitive for customer advocacy, PostBeyond may feel basic” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee advocacy · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PostBeyond, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PostBeyond was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

EveryoneSocial35 of 4210Compare →

DSMN832 of 425Compare →

Sociabble29 of 420Not among the top eight

GaggleAMP25 of 421Compare →

Hootsuite Amplify19 of 420Not among the top eight

Oktopost15 of 422Compare →

Haiilo13 of 420Not among the top eight

Clearview Social10 of 422Not among the top eight

Sprout Social10 of 420Not among the top eight

Taplio8 of 423Compare →

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PostBeyond. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 42 answers that named PostBeyond and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com23

blog.hootsuite.com21

magicpost.in20

dsmn8.com19

supergrow.ai19

g2.com18

taplio.com18

flockler.com16

postbeam.ai16

heysid.com15

185 of the 185 domain citations in answers naming PostBeyond came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/best-employee-advocacy-software-tools22

blog.hootsuite.com/employee-advocacy-tools19

taplio.com/blog/employee-advocacy-tools18

magicpost.in/blog/employee-advocacy-software17

dsmn8.com/blog/how-to-choose-the-best-employee-advocacy-platform16

postbeam.ai/blog/best-employee-advocacy-tools16

supergrow.ai/blog/employee-advocacy-tools16

heysid.com/resources/best-employee-advocacy-software-and-tools-for-b2b15

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

postbeyond.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PostBeyond takes 4% of first choices and DSMN8 takes 21%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee advocacy platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best employee advocacy platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 50 a month (“postbeyond”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 804 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 529 · 4 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,804
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 8 of 64 in employee advocacy

Segment leader

21%

DSMN8

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 42 answers
Its own site cited: in 39 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on postbeyond.com

649

subdomains included

Content

598

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

2 · 2

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	534	0	2026-04-09	CRM, SEO
Glossary or explainer	23	undated
Webinar or virtual event	19	0	2022-08-12
Conference or event	6	0	2020-01-10
Case study	5	0	2023-02-08
Report or ebook	5	0	2020-03-02
Comparison	2	0	2020-06-09
Podcast or video	2	0	2020-08-11
News or press	2	0	2020-04-28

Most recent

2026-04-09Employee advocacy roi blog
2026-03-18Employee advocacy software blog
2026-03-12Master the art of social selling strategies for modern sales teams blog
2023-12-18Hybrid work challenges solutions blog
2023-12-07Building thriving work community blog
2023-12-06Business impact employee advocacy soba 2023 blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page postbeyond.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as PostBeyond

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PostBeyond; a claim can dispute any of them.

PostBeyond (by Influitive) 2PostBeyond by Influitive 1PostBeyond by Infuitive 1

Follow PostBeyond

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

PostBeyond is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Employee Advocacy & Social Selling Solution
postbeyond.com
For: Marketers
postbeyond.com
Free plan or trial: Free Trial postbeyond.com
Customers named: DynatraceTreasure DataRandstad USAGoCardlessVTS
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting

What PostBeyond's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: postbeyond.com, postbeyond.com/product, postbeyond.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PostBeyond's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PostBeyond, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PostBeyond by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where PostBeyond is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name PostBeyond, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.