Every category where a model named Clearview Social for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Employee advocacy platforms	Marketing	0%	19 of 64	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Clearview Social yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Clearview Social across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels2

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative19 labels8not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labels1

Scale-constrained8 labels4

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative58 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For a slightly higher but still reasonable monthly fee, Clearview Social and SocialToaster are also strong choices” Mistral Small · Employee advocacy · budget prompt · alternative

“The best employee advocacy tools for small teams are Clearview Social and SocialToaster.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Employee advocacy · budget prompt · alternative

“Best For: Companies looking for a lightweight, easy-to-use solution for content sharing” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee advocacy · comparative prompt · alternative

“A solid option for mid-market B2B companies looking for an easy-to-use platform” Mistral Small · Employee advocacy · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Clearview Social, over the 58 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Clearview Social was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

EveryoneSocial38 of 588Not among the top eight

DSMN828 of 589Not among the top eight

GaggleAMP26 of 582Not among the top eight

Hootsuite Amplify25 of 581Not among the top eight

SocialToaster24 of 580Not among the top eight

Sociuu23 of 5810Not among the top eight

Taplio19 of 584Not among the top eight

Sociabble17 of 581Not among the top eight

Oktopost15 of 581Not among the top eight

Haiilo13 of 580Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Clearview Social. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 57 of the 58 answers that named Clearview Social and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

blog.hootsuite.com54

guideflow.com43

g2.com36

referralrock.com32

taplio.com32

dsmn8.com24

magicpost.in23

sproutsocial.com23

thecmo.com22

tryordinal.com20

309 of the 309 domain citations in answers naming Clearview Social came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.hootsuite.com/employee-advocacy-tools54

guideflow.com/blog/best-employee-advocacy-software-tools41

referralrock.com/blog/employee-advocacy-software32

taplio.com/blog/employee-advocacy-tools32

dsmn8.com/blog/how-to-choose-the-best-employee-advocacy-platform22

thecmo.com/tools/best-employee-advocacy-software22

sproutsocial.com/insights/employee-advocacy-tools21

g2.com/categories/employee-advocacy20

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

clearviewsocial.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Clearview Social takes 0% of first choices and DSMN8 takes 21%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “employee advocacy platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “best employee advocacy platform”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 260 a month (“clearview social”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 745 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 761 · 11 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 959
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 19 of 64 in employee advocacy

Segment leader

21%

DSMN8

First choices: 8 across its categories
Named in: 58 answers
Its own site cited: in 57 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on clearviewsocial.com

474

subdomains included

Content

445

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

5 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	372	0	2025-12-08	Employee advocacy, Social media
Webinar or virtual event	41	0	2022-11-02
Report or ebook	14	0	2022-11-02
Case study	7	undated
Comparison	4	undated
Conference or event	3	undated
Glossary or explainer	3	undated
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2025-12-086 templates that simplify social media marketing blog
2025-09-22Linkedin best practices for marketers 6 proven tactics blog
2025-08-255 ways to amplify your brand message through employee advocacy blog
2025-07-28What top performing teams do differently with employee advocacy on linkedin blog
2025-07-13Employee advocacy stats that should influence your marketing strategy blog
2025-06-23Why employees dont share company content creating what they want to post blog

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page clearviewsocial.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow Clearview Social

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Clearview Social is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Employee Advocacy Software
clearviewsocial.com
For: Businesses
clearviewsocial.com
Price stated: Team $425 /mo; Business $675 /mo; Enterprise Custom clearviewsocial.com/pricing
Starting price: 425 clearviewsocial.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: Get a Free Demo clearviewsocial.com
Customers named: Schneider DownsPernini LegalVeritivRea & AssociatesJackson WalkerBeachFleischmanSumoLogicBeachFleischman CPAs
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, certifications, hosting

What Clearview Social's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: clearviewsocial.com, clearviewsocial.com/pricing, clearviewsocial.com/use-cases/sales, clearviewsocial.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Clearview Social's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Clearview Social, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Clearview Social by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Clearview Social is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Clearview Social, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.