AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Sociabble · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Sociabble

99Judge labels
1First choices
24Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in Employee advocacy for enterprise buyers
Rank 17 of 64 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 16% of its 31 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Sociabble →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee advocacy · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sociabble for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Employee advocacy platformsMarketing0%17 of 6416%31accepted challenger
Loyalty, advocacy and referralsMarketing0%64 of 1100%2under 10 labels · led by Smile.io at 26%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sociabble yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sociabble across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502114
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2001203
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash01113
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K202114
GLM 4.7 FlashX02305
MiniMax M2.500112
GPT-6 Luna01001
Muse Glimmer 30B01113

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labelsNone
Paraphrase12 labelsNone
Comparative28 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained14 labelsNone
Scale-constrained13 labels1
Negative19 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative99 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Companies that want employee advocacy bundled with internal communications... More complex; often positioned at larger enterprises” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee advocacy · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Sociabble combines internal communications, employee engagement, and advocacy into one single platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee advocacy · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Sociabble is a close second for those wanting an all-in-one internal comms and advocacy solution” Mistral Small · Employee advocacy · direct prompt · alternative
“Described as the best all-in-one employee advocacy tool, suitable for global organizations.” Mistral Small · Employee advocacy · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Options to Avoid on a Tight Budget: ... Sociabble/PostBeyond/EveryoneSocial: Quote-based, generally enterprise pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee advocacy · budget prompt · hard negative
“its workflow is built for organizations that want to control the message rather than unlock authentic employee voices” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee advocacy · negative prompt · soft negative
“Bundled intranet solutions (Haiilo, some Sociabble configurations) — advocacy becomes neglected add-on” Kimi K2 · Employee advocacy · negative prompt · soft negative
“Better for larger organizations with 500+ employees, pricing is quote-based” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee advocacy · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sociabble, over the 99 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sociabble was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
EveryoneSocial82 of 9929Not among the top eight
DSMN876 of 9923Not among the top eight
GaggleAMP50 of 996Not among the top eight
Hootsuite Amplify49 of 990Not among the top eight
Oktopost44 of 994Not among the top eight
Haiilo39 of 991Not among the top eight
PostBeyond29 of 991Not among the top eight
Sprout Social Employee Advocacy19 of 990Not among the top eight
Sprout Social18 of 991Not among the top eight
Clearview Social17 of 993Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sociabble. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 99 answers that named Sociabble and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com61
blog.hootsuite.com54
dsmn8.com52
supergrow.ai52
heysid.com45
g2.com43
learn.g2.com42
magicpost.in40
postbeam.ai35
taplio.com30

454 of the 454 domain citations in answers naming Sociabble came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

sociabble.com ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Sociabble takes 0% of first choices and DSMN8 takes 21%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “employee advocacy platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best employee advocacy platform”
2
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“sociabble”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
2 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 24,668 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,816 · 130 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,543
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
1 ads · 1 text · 1 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2024, as Sociabble, verified.

On Google's pages: 1

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 17 of 64 in employee advocacy
Segment leader
21%
DSMN8
First choices
1 across its categories
Named in
99 answers
Its own site cited
in 97 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on sociabble.com
95
subdomains included
Content
10
counted in the table below
Documentation
20
Product · Integration
0 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog10undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page sociabble.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Sociabble

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Sociabble is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
All-In-One Employee Experience Platform; The Employee Communications and Advocacy Platform; the all-in-one platform for Internal Comms, Intranet & Employee Advocacy.
For
companies
Price stated
Sociabble pricing is based on your company size, number of users, and the specific modules you need. sociabble.com
Free plan or trial
Schedule a demo sociabble.com
Certifications
Great Place To WorkISO 27001GDPRCCPAIDPDPMicrosoft Gold Partner
Hosting
two distinct geographical regions
Customers named
EdenredUrssafVINCI EnergiesL’Occitane GroupTata Consultancy ServicesAllianz FrancePatapainMACSF
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations

What Sociabble's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: sociabble.com, sociabble.com/platform/security, sociabble.com/platform/chat, sociabble.com/case-studies, sociabble.com/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sociabble's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sociabble, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Sociabble by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Sociabble is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Sociabble, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sociabble.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.