GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Orum · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Orum

85Judge labels
7First choices
26Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in Dialers for enterprise buyers
Rank 6 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 22% of its 37 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dialers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Orum for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Sales dialers and callingSales7%6 of 7622%37accepted challenger
Sales engagement platformsSales0%23 of 550%1under 10 labels · led by Salesloft at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Orum yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Orum across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502114
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash31127
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast02013
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash20125
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01102
Kimi K212126
GLM 4.7 FlashX02103
MiniMax M2.502002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels5
Paraphrase9 labels1
Comparative23 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labelsNone
Scale-constrained12 labels1
Negative12 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative85 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“JustCall, Skipcall, Orum | Power + parallel dialing, better compliance tools” Kimi K2 · Dialers · negative prompt · first choice
“Funded, high-volume SDR org → Orum (volume) or Nooks (coaching + virtual salesfloor).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Dialers · direct prompt · first choice
“#### 1. Orum ... Best for: High-volume B2B tech and enterprise SDR/BDR teams.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Dialers · comparative prompt · first choice
“The undisputed "gold standard" for enterprise-level parallel dialing.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Dialers · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Orum charges $250 per user per month with a minimum of 3 users ... users already call it overpriced. Additionally, there are complaints about software bugs, dropped calls, poor audio quality” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Dialers · negative prompt · hard negative
“Nooks & Orum (Parallel Dialers) Biggest concerns: The structural "dead air" problem, spam flagging, and rapidly declining connect rates.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Dialers · negative prompt · hard negative
“Enterprise-focused, not budget-friendly” Kimi K2 · Dialers · budget prompt · hard negative
“Both are top-tier, highly capable AI parallel dialers. However, you must be cautious about their *pricing structure* and *data usage*.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Dialers · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Orum, over the 85 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Orum was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Nooks53 of 852Not in the top three
CloudTalk50 of 856Not in the top three
JustCall45 of 856Not in the top three
Kixie41 of 857Not in the top three
Aloware40 of 8515Not in the top three
PhoneBurner38 of 854Not in the top three
Aircall38 of 851Not in the top three
Five936 of 857Not in the top three
Dialpad34 of 851Not in the top three
Salesloft27 of 856Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Orum. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 12 of the 85 answers that named Orum and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudtalk.io6
skipcall.io6
aloware.com5
g2.com5
justcall.io5
croclub.com4
learn.g2.com4
marketbetter.ai4
nooks.ai4
trellus.ai4

Forty-seven of the forty-seven domain citations in answers naming Orum came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Orum's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Orum, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at orum.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.