Every category where a model named PhoneBurner for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Sales dialers and calling	Sales	0%	15 of 76	14%	22	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PhoneBurner yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PhoneBurner across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	3	1	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	1	4
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct11 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labelsNone

Comparative20 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained9 labels1

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative13 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative64 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Consider 1-to-1 power dialers (like PhoneBurner)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Dialers · negative prompt · first choice

“Mid-market teams | Kixie, PhoneBurner | Good balance of features and reliability” Kimi K2 · Dialers · negative prompt · alternative

“PhoneBurner (4.7\u20134.8/5 ratings, power dialer with spam mitigation features)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Dialers · negative prompt · alternative

“Best for: Teams prioritizing call quality, answer rates, and strict compliance.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Dialers · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Budget Traps to Avoid ... Expensive for budget-conscious teams” Kimi K2 · Dialers · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid: ... Enterprise tools (Kixie, PhoneBurner $140+).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Dialers · budget prompt · hard negative

“Cons: Most expensive option” Mistral Small · Dialers · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PhoneBurner, over the 64 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PhoneBurner was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

JustCall47 of 647Not in the top three

CloudTalk40 of 649Not in the top three

Kixie40 of 646Not in the top three

Orum38 of 648Not in the top three

Aloware32 of 6411Not in the top three

Aircall31 of 642Not in the top three

Nooks29 of 646Not in the top three

Dialpad21 of 640Not in the top three

Five920 of 643Not in the top three

Allo14 of 649Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PhoneBurner. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 64 answers that named PhoneBurner and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

cloudtalk.io6

aloware.com4

justcall.io4

skipcall.io4

trellus.ai4

learn.g2.com3

marketbetter.ai3

nooks.ai3

11x.ai2

croclub.com2

Thirty-five of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming PhoneBurner came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudtalk.io/blog/best-ai-sales-dialer-software5

skipcall.io/en/blog/best-sales-dialer-software4

aloware.com/blog/the-8-best-sales-dialers3

cloudtalk.io/blog/dialers-for-cold-calling3

justcall.io/blog/best-sales-dialer-software.html3

learn.g2.com/best-auto-dialer-software3

marketbetter.ai/blog/best-sales-dialers-for-sdr-teams-20263

nooks.ai/blog-posts/top-6-auto-dialers-for-sales-reps-in-20263

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PhoneBurner's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PhoneBurner, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at phoneburner.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.