Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 11 of 68
1 category · RankedPhoneBurner
68Judge labels
5First choices
18Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in Dialers for mid-market buyers
Rank 8 of 75 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 19% of its 27 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of PhoneBurner →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business11 of 70
2%24 labels
criticized challenger
Mid-market8 of 75
4%27 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise14 of 71
4%17 labels
criticized challenger
In dialers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named PhoneBurner for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales dialers and calling | Sales | 4% | 8 of 75 | 19% | 27 | accepted challenger | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, PhoneBurner held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Dialers · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 15 → 11 of 72
Enterprise▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 4%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 14 of 67
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dialers | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 8 of 75 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated PhoneBurner across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated PhoneBurner across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels2
Paraphrase11 labels2
Comparative19 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative10 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“PhoneBurner and Koncert are the top choices due to their B2B focus, scalability, and advanced dialing features.” Mistral Small · Dialers · direct prompt · first choice
“"Best for mid-market B2B sales teams of 3-10 reps who value personalized conversations over raw dial volume."” Muse Glimmer 30B · Dialers · direct prompt · first choice
“if your team is purely US-focused ... PhoneBurner is an excellent choice despite the higher price point” MiniMax M2.5 · Dialers · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Commonly described as a strong single-line power dialer for controlled, one-at-a-time calling.” Perplexity Sonar · Dialers · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Avoid premium options like PhoneBurner ($140/user/month)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Dialers · budget prompt · hard negative
“PhoneBurner is praised for unlimited calling but lacks deep CRM\u2011first analytics; it\u2019s only natively Salesforce\u2011linked.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Dialers · negative prompt · soft negative
“PhoneBurner and Kixie are more traditional\u2014they focus on dialing speed, not intelligence.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Dialers · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Expensive for small/budget teams.” Grok 4.20 · Dialers · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PhoneBurner, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PhoneBurner was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as PhoneBurner, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PhoneBurner was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PhoneBurner. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 68 answers that named PhoneBurner and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
justcall.io48
aloware.com41
cloudtalk.io41
guideflow.com34
kixie.com27
prospeo.io25
retellai.com25
close.com22
artisan.co18
blog.hubspot.com18
299 of the 299 domain citations in answers naming PhoneBurner came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
phoneburner.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PhoneBurner takes 4% of first choices and CloudTalk takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
phoneburner.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, PhoneBurner takes 4% of first choices and CloudTalk takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “sales dialer”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best sales dialer”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,900 a month (“phoneburner”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 28 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 10,321 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 2,523 · 104 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,456
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 8 of 75 in dialers
Segment leader
22%
CloudTalk
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 68 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 68 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on phoneburner.com
445
subdomains included
Content
338
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
8 · 13
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 266 | 0 | 2026-05-05 | CRM | |
| Case study | 31 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 22 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 13 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 3 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 2 | undated | |||
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-05-05Send better sales texts blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page phoneburner.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow PhoneBurner
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
PhoneBurner is its own company.ShowHide
The company
PhoneBurner is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- sales dialer software that helps outbound teams automate workflows, manage leads, and have more live conversations
- For
- outbound teams
- Price stated
- Standard: $140 per user/month billed annually, $165 billed monthly; Professional: $165 per user/month billed annually, $195 billed monthly; Premium: $183 per user/month billed annually, $215 billed monthly phoneburner.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 140 phoneburner.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Free trial available phoneburner.com
- Integrations claimed
- 150 phoneburner.com · 100 phoneburner.com/pricing · 4 phoneburner.com/customers pages disagree
- Certifications
- SOC 2 Type II Certified
- Customers named
- HomelyVertical Web Ventures, Inc.Hill Country Tech GuysThe She CenterIFPGLenCrediDudesTechnology Evaluation Center
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What PhoneBurner's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: phoneburner.com, phoneburner.com/pricing, trust.phoneburner.com, phoneburner.com/platform, phoneburner.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PhoneBurner's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PhoneBurner, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for PhoneBurner by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where PhoneBurner is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name PhoneBurner, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.