GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Aloware · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Aloware

66Judge labels
16First choices
6Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
18% in Dialers for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 76 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
6 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 27 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In dialers · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aloware for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Sales dialers and callingSales18%1 of 760%27accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aloware yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aloware across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash04004
Perplexity Sonar10102
Grok 4.1 Fast21003
Mistral Small20002
DeepSeek V4 Flash12104
Llama 4 Maverick30003
Qwen 3.7 Flash10102
Kimi K220103
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.520103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct21 labels9
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative23 labels11not counted in share
Budget-constrained8 labels6
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative66 labels in all, every segment counted; 16 of the 28 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Aloware stands out as the only platform combining enterprise AI, unlimited calling, deep CRM sync, and spam protection without enterprise pricing—making it the top choice” Kimi K2 · Dialers · comparative prompt · first choice
“Aloware offers the best combination of scalability, unlimited calling, deep CRM integration, and compliance features, making it the safest choice for 2025.” Mistral Small · Dialers · direct prompt · first choice
“The best sales dialer for a mid-market B2B company is Aloware, as it ranked #1 in a 90-day testing across all 6 criteria” Llama 4 Maverick · Dialers · direct prompt · first choice
“Aloware is the top overall choice for 2026, offering the best balance of features, CRM integration, and AI.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Dialers · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aloware, over the 66 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aloware was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Orum40 of 668Not in the top three
Kixie34 of 664Not in the top three
Nooks32 of 667Not in the top three
PhoneBurner32 of 660Not in the top three
Five926 of 665Not in the top three
Aircall21 of 660Not in the top three
Dialpad19 of 660Not in the top three
NICE CXone16 of 662Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aloware. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 66 answers that named Aloware and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

aloware.comYour site7
croclub.com7
justcall.io7
trellus.ai7
cloudtalk.io6
guideflow.com5
prospeo.io4
skipcall.io4
withallo.com4
nooks.ai3

Forty-seven of the fifty-four domain citations in answers naming Aloware came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aloware's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aloware, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at aloware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.