Every category where a model named Opteo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Search and social advertising platforms	Marketing	2%	15 of 137	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Opteo yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Opteo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative8 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Primary Tool: Opteo for Google Ads management (strong B2B search intent campaigns)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paid ads · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Safer bets: Optmyzr, Opteo, or native tools ... have stronger verified reviews.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Paid ads · negative prompt · first choice

“Opteo — $129/month (Google Ads only)... Cleaner and deeper than Adzooma for Google Ads specifically” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paid ads · budget prompt · alternative

“Best Value for Growing Businesses: Opteo” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“limited automation for larger accounts, so teams with high volume or complex workflows should be cautious” Perplexity Sonar · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Opteo, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Opteo was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Optmyzr19 of 242Not in the top three

Adzooma14 of 244Not in the top three

AdEspresso14 of 240Not in the top three

WordStream13 of 240Not in the top three

Meta Ads12 of 242Not in the top three

Skai12 of 241Not in the top three

Marin Software11 of 243Not in the top three

Google Ads11 of 242Not in the top three

Adalysis11 of 240Not in the top three

Madgicx10 of 241Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Opteo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 24 answers that named Opteo and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com4

zipdo.co4

clicksgeek.com3

get-ryze.ai3

hawksem.com3

designrush.com2

guideflow.com2

notfair.co2

reddit.com2

stackmatix.com2

Twenty-seven of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Opteo came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clicksgeek.com/paid-search-management-service3

hawksem.com/blog/ppc-management-software3

zipdo.co/best/paid-search-management-software3

clicksgeek.com/google-ads-management-software-comparison2

clicksgeek.com/paid-search-management-services2

designrush.com/agency/paid-media-pay-per-click/trends/ppc-platforms2

g2.com/categories/paid-search-advertising2

g2.com/categories/paid-search-advertising/small-business2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Opteo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Opteo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at opteo.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.