Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 24 → 22 of 106
1 category · RankedOpteo
21Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Paid ads for small business buyers
Rank 91 of 113 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 43% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business24 of 113
0%12 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market91 of 113
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise56 of 88
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In paid ads · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Opteo for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Search and social advertising platforms | Marketing | 0% | 91 of 113 | 43% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Google Ads at 13% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Opteo held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Paid ads · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 15 → 88 of 107
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paid ads | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 15 → 91 of 113 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Opteo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Opteo across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative6 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative5 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative21 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Guided optimization, recommendation feed... SMBs focused on Google Ads only” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paid ads · comparative prompt · alternative
“specialized auditing tools like TrueClicks or Opteo” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · alternative
“consider well-established platforms like... Opteo” MiniMax M2.5 · Paid ads · negative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“If yes, avoid tools like Opteo (Google-only)” Kimi K2 · Paid ads · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“works best when the account is already well organized, which means it may be less helpful for messy, immature, or poorly governed accounts” Perplexity Sonar · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative
“Excellent PPC-only (Google/Microsoft), affordable audits | Limited/weak social support” Grok 4.20 · Paid ads · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Opteo, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Opteo was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Opteo, over the 21 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Opteo was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Opteo. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 21 of the 21 answers that named Opteo and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
get-ryze.ai15
blog.hubspot.com13
adstellar.ai10
fueler.io10
resources.rework.com9
adlibrary.com8
optmyzr.com8
worldmetrics.org8
almcorp.com7
bir.ch7
Ninety-five of the ninety-five domain citations in answers naming Opteo came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
opteo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Opteo takes 0% of first choices and Google Ads takes 13%.ShowHide
Search and answers
opteo.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Opteo takes 0% of first choices and Google Ads takes 13%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “paid search and social ads management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best paid search and social ads management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 390 a month (“opteo”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 11 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 163 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 101 · 1 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 752
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 91 of 113 in paid ads
Segment leader
13%
Google Ads
- First choices
- 0 across its categories
- Named in
- 21 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 21 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on opteo.com
159
subdomains included
Content
12
counted in the table below
Documentation
138
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 7 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2026-05-11 | ||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-05-1110102404 set up your opteo account glossary or explainer
- 2026-03-1610102424 global navigation settings glossary or explainer
- 2025-07-0310177961 deep linking glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page opteo.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Opteo
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Opteo; a claim can dispute any of them.
Optmyzr/Opteo 1
Follow Opteo
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Opteo is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Opteo is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- the smarter way to manage your Google Ads accounts.
- For
- Google Ads managers
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free 14 Day Trial opteo.com
- Customers named
- Acesso DigitalEvergreen AgencyHyperSEMDeliveroo
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting
What Opteo's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: opteo.com. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Opteo's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Opteo, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Opteo by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Opteo is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Opteo, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.