Every category where a model named Adalysis for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Search and social advertising platforms	Marketing	0%	30 of 137	8%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Adalysis yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Adalysis across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	3	0	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative7 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Optmyzr or Adalysis if your priority is PPC optimization depth” Perplexity Sonar · Paid ads · comparative prompt · alternative

“or Adalysis are better alternatives to the platforms listed above” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Paid ads · negative prompt · alternative

“Search-heavy PPC team? → Optmyzr or Adalysis” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paid ads · comparative prompt · alternative

“Google ads testing, automated auditing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Paid ads · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“limited support for newer campaign types like PMax, so it may be a poor fit” Perplexity Sonar · Paid ads · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Adalysis, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Adalysis was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Optmyzr20 of 235Not in the top three

Skai18 of 232Not in the top three

Marin Software16 of 234Not in the top three

Madgicx11 of 231Not in the top three

Opteo11 of 231Not in the top three

WordStream11 of 230Not in the top three

Adzooma10 of 230Not in the top three

Meta Ads9 of 232Not in the top three

AdEspresso9 of 230Not in the top three

Smartly9 of 230Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Adalysis. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 23 answers that named Adalysis and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

clicksgeek.com2

g2.com2

get-ryze.ai2

hawksem.com2

reddit.com2

stackmatix.com2

worldmetrics.org2

zipdo.co2

adspirer.com1

blog.wask.co1

Eighteen of the eighteen domain citations in answers naming Adalysis came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

clicksgeek.com/paid-search-management-service2

g2.com/categories/paid-search-advertising2

hawksem.com/blog/ppc-management-software2

reddit.com/r/PPC/comments/1fkn1a3/which_agency_software_for_ads_management_should_i2

stackmatix.com/blog/best-ppc-platforms-tools2

worldmetrics.org/best/paid-search-software2

worldmetrics.org/service/paid-search-management2

zipdo.co/best/paid-search-management-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Adalysis's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Adalysis, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adalysis.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.