AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Meta Audience Insights · October 2026 Edition
Meta · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Meta Audience Insights

4Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Meta Audience Insights was named 2 times in Audience insights, where SparkToro led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In audience insights · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Meta Audience Insights for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Audience and consumer insights platformsMarketing2%14 of 1550%2under 10 labels · led by SparkToro at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Meta Audience Insights yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Meta Audience Insights across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B10001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative4 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“often recommended for solo marketers and small teams that need free, first-party directional evidence” Muse Glimmer 30B · Audience insights · budget prompt · first choice
“Meta Audience Insights — if you're in the Meta ecosystem” Kimi K2 · Audience insights · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Meta Audience Insights, over the 4 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Meta Audience Insights was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Google Analytics 43 of 42Not among the top eight
SparkToro3 of 40Not among the top eight
Amazon Marketing Cloud1 of 40Not among the top eight
Delve AI1 of 40Not among the top eight
Disney1 of 40Not among the top eight
Google Ads Data Hub1 of 40Not among the top eight
Habu1 of 40Not among the top eight
InfoSum1 of 40Not among the top eight
LinkedIn Page Insights1 of 40Not among the top eight
Matomo1 of 40Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Meta Audience Insights. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 4 answers that named Meta Audience Insights and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

us.fitgap.com3
adstellar.ai2
birdeye.com2
cometly.com2
dashly.io2
diyai.io2
lilachbullock.com2
productlondondesign.com2
sparktoro.com2
adamigo.ai1

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming Meta Audience Insights came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Meta Audience Insights

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Meta Platforms is the company behind Meta Audience Insights.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Website
meta.com
Headquarters
Menlo Park, United States
Founded
2004
Employees
about 58,604 (2020)
Ownership
Public, META on Nasdaq

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Meta Audience Insights's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Meta Audience Insights, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Meta Audience Insights by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Meta Audience Insights is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Meta Audience Insights, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at meta.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.