GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Maptitude · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Maptitude

8Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Maptitude was named 3 times in Territory planning and 1 other category, where CaptivateIQ led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business53 of 121

under the label threshold

Mid-market37 of 103

under the label threshold

Enterprise52 of 85

under the label threshold

In territory planning · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Maptitude for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Territory and quota planning	Revenue operations	0%	37 of 103	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by CaptivateIQ at 30%
Retail, proximity and IoT marketing	Marketing	0%	94 of 131	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Radar at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Maptitude yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Maptitude across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“$695 one-time license (no subscription). Powerful desktop GIS on a budget” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative

“Maptitude is the golden standard... Flat $695 one-time license fee” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Territory planning · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Maptitude, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Maptitude was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan5 of 81Not in the top three

Varicent5 of 81Not in the top three

MapBusinessOnline4 of 82Not in the top three

eSpatial4 of 81Not in the top three

Fullcast4 of 80Not in the top three

Mapline3 of 81Not in the top three

Badger Maps3 of 80Not in the top three

CaptivateIQ3 of 80Not in the top three

Maptive3 of 80Not in the top three

Salesforce Maps3 of 80Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Maptitude. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 8 answers that named Maptitude and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

articsledge.com1

bitscale.ai1

capterra.com1

captivateiq.com1

everstage.com1

gitnux.org1

gradient.works1

guideflow.com1

marketresearchfuture.com1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Maptitude came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

articsledge.com/post/territory-planning-software1

bitscale.ai/blogs/best-territory-planning-tools1

capterra.com/p/123834/eSpatial1

capterra.com/p/124748/Map-Business-Online/reviews1

capterra.com/p/203718/QuotaPath/reviews1

capterra.com/p/215948/OALLEY1

capterra.com/p/93335/Maptitude1

capterra.com/sales-performance-management-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Maptitude's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Maptitude, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at maptitude.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.