GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Magentrix PRM · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Magentrix PRM

9Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

9 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Magentrix PRM was named 2 times in Channel marketing and 1 other category, where JourneyBee led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business33 of 128

under the label threshold

Mid-market50 of 108

under the label threshold

Enterprise29 of 93

under the label threshold

In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Magentrix PRM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Channel partner and local marketing	Partner and channel	0%	50 of 108	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%
Partner relationship management	Partner and channel	0%	46 of 50	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Channeltivity at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Magentrix PRM yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Magentrix PRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“CRM-mirroring (Salesforce/HubSpot/Dynamics), governed co-branding, customizable for mid-market.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Channel marketing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“complaints center on navigation, reporting, customization limits, and a learning curve” GPT-5.4 mini · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Magentrix PRM, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Magentrix PRM was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Unifyr9 of 91Not in the top three

Ansira5 of 93Not in the top three

Channeltivity5 of 91Not in the top three

Impartner PRM5 of 91Not in the top three

SproutLoud4 of 90Not in the top three

ZINFI Unified Partner Management4 of 90Not in the top three

Channelscaler3 of 90Not in the top three

Mindmatrix3 of 90Not in the top three

PartnerStack3 of 90Not in the top three

Impartner2 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Magentrix PRM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 9 answers that named Magentrix PRM and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com2

braze.com1

cleverly.co1

digitalhill.com1

engagelab.com1

improvado.io1

insiderone.com1

journeybee.io1

maestra.io1

martal.ca1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Magentrix PRM came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

braze.com/resources/articles/cross-channel-marketing-platform1

cleverly.co/blog/best-omnichannel-software1

digitalhill.com/blog/top-channel-partner-marketing-agencies-software-comparison1

engagelab.com/blog/omnichannel-marketing-platforms1

g2.com/categories/partner-relationship-management-prm1

g2.com/categories/through-channel-marketing1

g2.com/products/impartner-prm/reviews1

g2.com/products/salesforce-partner-cloud-formerly-salesforce-prm/reviews1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Magentrix PRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Magentrix PRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at magentrix.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.