Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 39 → 55 of 67
2 categories · RankedMagentrix PRM
23Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
10 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in PRM for mid-market buyers
Rank 12 of 61 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 12% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business57 of 69
0%1 label
under the label threshold
Mid-market12 of 61
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise13 of 60
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
In prm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Magentrix PRM for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 2% | 12 of 61 | 12% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerPortal.io at 22% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 34 of 124 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Magentrix PRM held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · PRM · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 13 → 11 of 59
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 → 11 of 53
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRM | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 13 → 12 of 61 |
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 30 → 34 of 124 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Magentrix PRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Magentrix PRM across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative8 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best budget-friendly option: Magentrix PRM” GPT-5.4 mini · PRM · budget prompt · first choice
“typically positioned as a PRM platform; commonly used for partner portals, onboarding, and collaboration rather than deep local-channel marketing execution” GPT-5.4 mini · Channel marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best for Deep Salesforce Customization: Magentrix ... Magentrix is the way to go.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · PRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Choose Magentrix if collaboration, workflows, and knowledge access matter most.” Perplexity Sonar · PRM · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Magentrix, for example, explicitly describes its CRM integration model as schema mirroring with the CRM remaining the system of record.” GPT-5.4 mini · PRM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Magentrix PRM, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Magentrix PRM was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Magentrix PRM, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Magentrix PRM was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Magentrix PRM. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named Magentrix PRM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com12
guideflow.com9
monday.com9
journeybee.io8
zinfi.com8
learn.g2.com7
magentrix.comYour site6
partnerportal.io6
gartner.com5
impartner.com5
Sixty-nine of the seventy-five domain citations in answers naming Magentrix PRM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
magentrix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Magentrix PRM takes 2% of first choices and PartnerPortal.io takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
magentrix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Magentrix PRM takes 2% of first choices and PartnerPortal.io takes 22%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “partner relationship management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best partner relationship management platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“magentrix prm”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 2,460 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 526 · 31 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 709
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 12 of 61 in PRM
Segment leader
22%
PartnerPortal.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on magentrix.com
228
subdomains included
Content
168
counted in the table below
Documentation
6
Product · Integration
8 · 10
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 85 | 7 | 2026-07-28 | PRM, CRM | |
| Glossary or explainer | 29 | 0 | 2026-06-29 | PRM | |
| Case study | 22 | undated | PRM | ||
| News or press | 17 | undated | PRM | ||
| Comparison | 8 | 0 | 2026-05-04 | PRM, CRM | |
| Podcast or video | 6 | undated | PRM | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | PRM |
Most recent
- 2026-07-28Client portal software blog
- 2026-07-21Will your prm scale blog
- 2026-07-20Association management software blog
- 2026-07-16Partner ecosystem management blog
- 2026-07-08Meet the wizard agent blog
- 2026-07-03Customer self service software blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page magentrix.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Magentrix PRM
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Magentrix PRM; a claim can dispute any of them.
Magentrix 10
Follow Magentrix PRM
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Magentrix PRM is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Magentrix PRM is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Magentrix is the Data Foundation for Channel Sales - the only PRM that mirrors your CRM data and schema. 100% no-code to launch, API-first, and extensible.
- For
- companies managing partnerships
- Price stated
- USD 1500 per month magentrix.com/prm
- Starting price
- 1500 magentrix.com/prm
- Free plan or trial
- Try for 1 month magentrix.com/pricing/partner-portal
- Integrations claimed
- 3 magentrix.com/features/ai
- Certifications
- ISO 27001SOC 2 Type IISOC 3ISO 27001:2022PCI DSS
- Hosting
- CanadaUnited StatesMarkham, ON, CanadaMississauga, ON, Canada
- Customers named
- ZapierOtavaGlassboxUbicquiaTempo.ioMagaya
What Magentrix PRM's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: magentrix.com/prm, magentrix.com, magentrix.com/pricing/partner-portal, trust.magentrix.com, magentrix.com/features/ai. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Magentrix PRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Magentrix PRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Magentrix PRM by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Magentrix PRM is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Magentrix PRM, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.