GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Structured · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Structured

6Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
4 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Structured was named 3 times in Channel marketing, where JourneyBee led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Structured for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Channel partner and local marketingPartner and channel0%39 of 10833%3under 10 labels · led by JourneyBee at 15%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Structured yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Structured across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10012
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labels1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative2 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Structured is a premier B2B Partner Marketing Automation Platform (PMAP)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · comparative prompt · first choice
“AI-native partner marketing automation platform built for global B2B enterprises” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Channel marketing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“traditionally built for enterprises and often cost thousands of dollars a month, putting them out of reach for companies on a tight budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Channel marketing · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Structured, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Structured was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Unifyr6 of 60Not in the top three
Impartner5 of 61Not in the top three
Mindmatrix3 of 60Not in the top three
SproutLoud3 of 60Not in the top three
ZINFI3 of 60Not in the top three
Channelscaler2 of 60Not in the top three
ZINFI Technologies2 of 60Not in the top three
GoTu Grow by Extu1 of 61Not in the top three
Ansira1 of 60Not in the top three
BrandMuscle1 of 60Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Structured. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 6 answers that named Structured and are not a share of its labels.

Names read as Structured

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Structured; a claim can dispute any of them.
Structured (formerly StructuredWeb) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Structured's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Structured, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at structuredweb.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack