Small businessnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 24 of 123, unchanged
2 categories · RankedStructured
20Judge labels
5First choices
2Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Channel marketing for enterprise buyers
Rank 35 of 124 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 4 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 128
2%3 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market35 of 124
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise6 of 79
6%11 labels
accepted challenger
In channel marketing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Structured for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Channel partner and local marketing | Partner and channel | 0% | 35 of 124 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Channelscaler at 10% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Partner relationship management | Partner and channel | 0% | 41 of 61 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by PartnerPortal.io at 22% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Structured held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Channel marketing · by segment
Mid-market=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 38 → 33 of 120
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 11 → 6 of 77
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Channel marketing | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 38 → 35 of 124 |
| PRM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 41 of 61, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Structured across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Structured across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels4
Paraphrase1 label1
Comparative7 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Structured, Unifyr, and Extu are good choices depending on your UX preferences.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Channel marketing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Structured, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Structured was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Structured, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Structured was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Structured. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Structured and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com16
technologyadvice.com12
improvado.io10
journeybee.io10
introw.io8
worldmetrics.org7
maestra.io6
structured.aiYour site6
us.fitgap.com6
martal.ca5
Eighty of the eighty-six domain citations in answers naming Structured came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
structured.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Structured takes 0% of first choices and Channelscaler takes 10%.ShowHide
Search and answers
structured.ai is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Structured takes 0% of first choices and Channelscaler takes 10%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “through-channel marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best through-channel marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 12,100 a month (“structured”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 273,655 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 716 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 71 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 533
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 35 of 124 in channel marketing
Segment leader
10%
Channelscaler
- First choices
- 5 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 20 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on structured.ai
347
subdomains included
Content
219
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
5 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 181 | 16 | 2026-09-11 | Marketing automation | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 14 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Podcast or video | 11 | 0 | 2026-06-17 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 3 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2025-10-24 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | 1 | 2026-08-21 | PRM | |
| Report or ebook | 1 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | 0 | 2025-12-23 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28What is a partner ecosystem glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-11Ai for campaign execution blog
- 2026-09-11What is distributed marketing glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-11How to activate partners at scale blog
- 2026-09-08Structured earns 13 g2 fall 2026 badges for customer experience ease of use and partner marketing excellence blog
- 2026-09-01How to measure campaign performance blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page structured.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Structured
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Structured; a claim can dispute any of them.
Structured (structured.com) 1
Follow Structured
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Structured is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Structured is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The AI-first Partner Marketing Automation Platform (PMAP) for B2B enterprises. The next generation of through-channel marketing automation, built for global scale.
- For
- B2B enterprises
- Certifications
- Named a Leader by ForresterForrester Wave™ ‘Leader’SOC 2GDPRADA
- Customers named
- ServiceNowIBMGoogleMicrosoftDellZoomA Fluent VisionIngram Micro
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting
What Structured's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: structured.ai, structured.ai/solutions, structured.ai/resources/case-studies, structured.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Structured's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Structured, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Structured by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Structured is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Structured, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.