AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › LiveChat · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Named, not ranked

LiveChat

17Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LiveChat was named 4 times in Conversational mktg and 2 other categories, where Tidio led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In conversational mktg · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LiveChat for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Conversational marketing platformsMarketing0%86 of 87100%2under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13%
Chatbots and conversational AI for supportCustomer0%88 of 1140%1under 10 labels · led by Intercom Fin AI Agent at 41%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
In-app messaging and customer communicationsCustomer0%49 of 1050%1under 10 labels · led by Intercom at 21%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LiveChat yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LiveChat across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00011

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labelsNone
Comparative2 labelsNone
Budget-constrained4 labels1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative17 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Budget-Friendly: LiveChat or Tidio for simpler needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · In-app messaging · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“better for smaller teams or more basic chat needs, but usually less pipeline-focused for B2B” GPT-5.4 mini · Conversational mktg · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“Reviewers note deceptive free trials for Drift/Intercom/LiveChat” Muse Glimmer 30B · Conversational mktg · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LiveChat, over the 17 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LiveChat was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Drift11 of 172Not among the top eight
Intercom11 of 172Not among the top eight
Tidio9 of 175Not among the top eight
Crisp5 of 171Not among the top eight
Freshchat5 of 170Not among the top eight
Zendesk AI4 of 170Not among the top eight
Intercom Fin AI Agent3 of 170Not among the top eight
ChatBot.com2 of 170Not among the top eight
CometChat2 of 170Not among the top eight
Creatio2 of 170Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LiveChat. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 17 answers that named LiveChat and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com6
guideflow.com6
tidio.com5
capterra.com4
intercom.com4
resources.rework.com4
wonderchat.io4
botpress.com3
conferbot.com3
dashly.io3

Forty-two of the forty-two domain citations in answers naming LiveChat came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on livechat.com
2,150
subdomains included
Content
244
counted in the table below
Documentation
361
Product · Integration
73 · 509
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Podcast or video101undatedEcommerce
Case study48undated
Webinar or virtual event24undated
Comparison2022026-08-21
Blog1612026-08-20
Glossary or explainer1302026-02-13
Report or ebook1002018-02-19
Template or tool6undated
News or press6undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page livechat.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as LiveChat

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as LiveChat; a claim can dispute any of them.
LiveChat Starter 1

Follow LiveChat

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

LiveChat.
ShowHide

On record

Wikidata
Founded
2002

Fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · LinkedIn

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The best AI live chat software for business, perfect for ecommerce and B2B.
For
business; designed for B2B SaaS companies and ecommerce stores
Price stated
Starts from $19 monthly livechat.com
Starting price
19 livechat.com
Free plan or trial
Free 14-day trial No credit card required livechat.com
Integrations claimed
200 livechat.com
Certifications
WCAG 2.1 Level AAHIPAAGDPR ComplianceHIPAA ReadinessPrivacy Shield CertifiedCSA STAR Certification
Hosting
USEUEuropeEuropean Union
Customers named
SephoraLuxury Estates InternationalGreenState Credit UnionKent Bicycles Service CenterThe Cake PlannerMONTBLANC LMDMÓRTTUAylala

What LiveChat's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: livechat.com, livechat.com, livechat.com/pricing, livechat.com/features/security, livechat.com/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LiveChat's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LiveChat, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LiveChat by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where LiveChat is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name LiveChat, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at livechat.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.