Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 86 → 20 of 123
Lessonly
24Judge labels
1First choices
3Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Sales coaching for mid-market buyers
Rank 25 of 124 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business26 of 128
2%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market25 of 124
0%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise19 of 83
0%4 labels
under the label threshold
In sales coaching · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lessonly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching and training | Sales | 0% | 25 of 124 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by MindTickle at 24% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Customer education and LMS | Customer | 0% | 54 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by LearnUpon at 26% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Sales enablement and content | Sales | 0% | 51 of 72 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by HubSpot Sales Hub at 29% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lessonly held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales coaching · by segment
Mid-market▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 16 → 27 of 118
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 61 → 19 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales coaching | 2% | 0% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 16 → 25 of 124 |
| Customer education | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 54 of 86, unchanged |
| Sales enablement | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 72, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lessonly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lessonly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct2 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained2 labelsNone
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative24 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Differentiator: Simplest and fastest to deploy; ideal for mid-market teams prioritizing speed over complexity.” Kimi K2 · Sales coaching · comparative prompt · alternative
“Consider Lessonly if you need to get new reps productive ASAP” Kimi K2 · Sales coaching · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lessonly, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lessonly was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lessonly, over the 24 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lessonly was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lessonly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 24 answers that named Lessonly and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
g2.com10
guideflow.com8
pitchmonster.io7
cloudtalk.io6
prospeo.io6
dock.us5
learn.g2.com5
cleanlist.ai4
mailmodo.com4
mindtickle.com4
No domain is on file for Lessonly, so its own site is not marked.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Lessonly stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Lessonly stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 2,400 a month (“lessonly”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 45 a month
- Its own site
- No site of its own on file, so no site figures
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 25 of 124 in sales coaching
Segment leader
24%
MindTickle
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 24 answers
- Its own site cited
- No site on file to match
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
Names read as Lessonly
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lessonly; a claim can dispute any of them.
Lessonly (Seismic Learning) 2Lessonly / Seismic Learning 2Lessonly (Seismic) 1Lessonly (now part of Seismic) 1
Follow Lessonly
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lessonly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lessonly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lessonly by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lessonly is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lessonly, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.