GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Lemon Learning · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Lemon Learning

10Judge labels

3First choices

0Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lemon Learning was named 1 time in Digital adoption, where Userpilot led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business10 of 53

under the label threshold

Mid-market49 of 58

under the label threshold

Enterprise5 of 38

under the label threshold

In digital adoption · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Lemon Learning for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Digital adoption and onboarding	Customer	0%	49 of 58	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Userpilot at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lemon Learning yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lemon Learning across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative2 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative10 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lemon Learning, over the 10 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lemon Learning was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Whatfix10 of 104Not in the top three

WalkMe9 of 104Not in the top three

Pendo8 of 100Not in the top three

Apty6 of 102Not in the top three

Userlane6 of 101Not in the top three

Appcues6 of 100Not in the top three

Userpilot6 of 100Not in the top three

Spekit4 of 100Not in the top three

Chameleon2 of 100Not in the top three

UserGuiding2 of 100Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lemon Learning. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 10 answers that named Lemon Learning and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

lemonlearning.comYour site3

userpilot.com3

vividminds.ai3

whatfix.com3

apty.ai2

gartner.com2

guideflow.com2

tango.ai2

appcues.com1

assimasolutions.com1

Nineteen of the twenty-two domain citations in answers naming Lemon Learning came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

lemonlearning.com/best-digital-adoption-platforms3

userpilot.com/blog/digital-adoption-platforms3

vividminds.ai/products/guidenow/blog/best-digital-adoption-platforms3

whatfix.com/digital-adoption-platform3

apty.ai/blog/best-digital-adoption-platforms2

gartner.com/reviews/market/digital-adoption-platforms2

guideflow.com/blog/best-digital-adoption-platforms2

tango.ai/blog/digital-adoption-platform-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lemon Learning's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lemon Learning, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lemonlearning.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.