GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Leadspace · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Leadspace

16Judge labels

2First choices

6Negative labels

10 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Leadspace was named 4 times in Identity and 1 other category, where Hightouch led with 15%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market144 of 151

under the label threshold

Enterprise7 of 137

under the label threshold

In identity · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Leadspace for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Identity resolution	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	144 of 151	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by Hightouch at 15%
Lead routing and management	Sales	0%	74 of 104	50%	2	under 10 labels · led by LeadAngel at 32%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Leadspace yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Leadspace across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase3 labels1

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Leadspace | $50K+/year — requires dedicated data-ops headcount” Kimi K2 · Identity · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“cannot afford the high licensing fees and heavy engineering overhead of enterprise-grade Customer Data Platforms (like Adobe Real-Time CDP or Leadspace)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Identity · direct prompt · soft negative

“Higher entry cost compared to competitors” MiniMax M2.5 · Lead routing · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Leadspace, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Leadspace was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

ZoomInfo7 of 162Not in the top three

Demandbase7 of 160Not in the top three

6sense6 of 160Not in the top three

HubSpot Breeze Intelligence6 of 160Not in the top three

Cognism5 of 160Not in the top three

Adobe Real-Time CDP4 of 161Not in the top three

Apollo.io4 of 161Not in the top three

Salesforce Data Cloud4 of 160Not in the top three

ActionIQ3 of 160Not in the top three

Clay3 of 160Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Leadspace. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 16 answers that named Leadspace and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

improvado.io2

salesforce.com2

bairesdev.com1

blog.uxtweak.com1

brevo.com1

business.adobe.com1

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com1

clearbit.com1

cleverly.co1

cognism.com1

Twelve of the twelve domain citations in answers naming Leadspace came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bairesdev.com/blog/types-of-customer-data-analytics1

blog.uxtweak.com/customer-analytics-software1

brevo.com/blog/best-customer-data-platform1

business.adobe.com/resources/sdk/choosing-the-right-analytics-platform-for-b2b.html1

cio.economictimes.indiatimes.com/tools/best-customer-data-platforms/1276110751

clearbit.com/1

clearbit.com/platform/enrichment1

cleverly.co/blog/lead-routing-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Leadspace

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Leadspace; a claim can dispute any of them.

LeadSpace 1

The company

Leadspace.

Website: leadspace.com
Headquarters: Menlo Park, United States
Founded: 2007

From Wikidata, fetched September 14, 2026. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata · Crunchbase

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Leadspace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Leadspace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at leadspace.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.