Small business=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 12 → 17 of 53
2 categories · Named, not rankedLead411
20Judge labels
1First choices
4Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
9 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Lead411 was named 9 times in Sales intel and 1 other category, where Apollo.io led with 73%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business13 of 55
0%6 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market6 of 52
2%8 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In sales intel · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Lead411 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales intelligence and contact data | Sales | 2% | 6 of 52 | 25% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 73% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| B2B intent data providers | Sales | 0% | 35 of 60 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 27% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Lead411 held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · Sales intel · by segment
Mid-market▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 12 → 7 of 50
EnterprisegoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sales intel | 0% | 2% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 12 → 6 of 52 |
| Intent data | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 35 of 60, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Lead411 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Lead411 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative4 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“The best B2B contact data and sales intelligence platform for a company with a limited budget is Lead411” Llama 4 Maverick · Sales intel · budget prompt · first choice
“Bundles verified contact data with buying-intent signals at a more accessible price than enterprise platforms” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Sales intel · budget prompt · alternative
“Specifically designed for mid-market sales teams, Lead411 provides verified contact data and intent signals” Muse Glimmer 30B · Sales intel · direct prompt · alternative
“Lead411 is described as budget-friendly with pricing starting at $99/month” Perplexity Sonar · Intent data · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“reports of only 3% email deliverability after validation... High bounce rates and poor customer support responses” MiniMax M2.5 · Sales intel · negative prompt · hard negative
“Solid for verified US emails, but has limitations” Kimi K2 · Sales intel · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lead411, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lead411 was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Lead411, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lead411 was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lead411. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 20 of the 20 answers that named Lead411 and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
pipeline.zoominfo.com12
amplemarket.com9
salesmotion.io9
demandbase.com7
autobound.ai6
blog.hubspot.com6
bookyourdata.com6
kayako.com6
lusha.com6
apollo.io5
Seventy-two of the seventy-two domain citations in answers naming Lead411 came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
lead411.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lead411 takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 73%.ShowHide
Search and answers
lead411.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Lead411 takes 2% of first choices and Apollo.io takes 73%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “b2b contact data and sales intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “best b2b contact data and sales intelligence platform”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 1,600 a month (“lead411”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 29 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 79,355 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,937 · 64 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,918
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 52 in sales intel
Segment leader
73%
Apollo.io
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 20 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 20 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on lead411.com
640
subdomains included
Content
323
counted in the table below
Documentation
1
Product · Integration
0 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 273 | 0 | 2026-05-29 | CRM, ABM | |
| Comparison | 41 | 0 | 2026-06-01 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | 0 | 2026-05-27 | ||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated | |||
| News or press | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-06-01Lead411 vs cognism which b2b data provider delivers better data more meetings and higher roi in 2026 comparison
- 2026-05-29Why outbound feels harder than it did 3 years ago blog
- 2026-05-29Why companies move on from clay the hidden cost of chasing more data blog
- 2026-05-28Why revenue infrastructure is replacing traditional sales stacks in 2026 blog
- 2026-05-28Why customers leave apollo io in 2026 and what most sales team realize when its too late blog
- 2026-05-27What is the best most affordable b2b data provider with the most accurate data in 2026 the truth most sales teams learn glossary or explainer
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page lead411.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Lead411
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Lead411 is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Lead411 is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Unlimited B2B leads database for SMB outbound lead generation
- For
- SMB outbound lead generation
- Price stated
- Unlimited data starting at just $49 per month. lead411.com/pricing
- Starting price
- 49 lead411.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start your free trial today. lead411.com
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting, customers
What Lead411's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: lead411.com, lead411.com/pricing, lead411.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lead411's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lead411, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Lead411 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Lead411 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Lead411, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.