AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › Landbot · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Landbot

20Judge labels
0First choices
5Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
5 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Landbot was named 5 times in Conversational mktg, where Tidio led with 13%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In conversational mktg · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Landbot for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Conversational marketing platformsMarketing0%32 of 8720%5under 10 labels · led by Tidio at 13%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Landbot yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Landbot across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2000000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct3 labelsNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Landobot allows you to build a completely bespoke experience without writing code” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Conversational mktg · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best budget-friendly Drift alternative” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Conversational mktg · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best Budget-Friendly Option” Kimi K2 · Conversational mktg · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Caution level: Medium ... Weak support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Conversational mktg · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Landbot, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Landbot was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Drift16 of 202Not among the top eight
Intercom16 of 200Not among the top eight
Tidio13 of 206Not among the top eight
Qualified8 of 202Not among the top eight
Crisp8 of 201Not among the top eight
HubSpot Conversations6 of 202Not among the top eight
ManyChat6 of 200Not among the top eight
1mind5 of 201Not among the top eight
ChatBot.com3 of 201Not among the top eight
Intercom Fin AI Agent3 of 201Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Landbot. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 20 answers that named Landbot and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com9
thecmo.com9
wonderchat.io8
cloudtalk.io7
guideflow.com7
learn.g2.com7
1mind.com6
storylane.io6
getperspective.ai5
pipeline.zoominfo.com5

Sixty-nine of the sixty-nine domain citations in answers naming Landbot came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on landbot.io
2,455
subdomains included
Content
1,157
counted in the table below
Documentation
433
Product · Integration
14 · 30
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog77942026-09-04SEO, CRM
Glossary or explainer20602023-05-09
Comparison70232026-08-28
Case study3602022-10-24
Webinar or virtual event3102021-05-20
Report or ebook2502022-04-28
Template or tool402021-08-03
Podcast or video402022-02-03
News or press2undated

Most recent

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page landbot.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SEO (10); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Landbot

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Landbot's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Landbot, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Landbot by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Landbot is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Landbot, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at landbot.io is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.