AI Indexes
GTM AI Index
Index › Products › 1mind · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

1mind

44Judge labels
6First choices
6Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in Conversational mktg for enterprise buyers
Rank 9 of 87 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 15% of its 13 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of 1mind →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In conversational mktg · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 1mind for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Conversational marketing platformsMarketing4%9 of 8715%13accepted challenger
AI SDR agentsSales0%41 of 770%2under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 24%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Chatbots and conversational AI for supportCustomer0%72 of 1140%1under 10 labels · led by Intercom Fin AI Agent at 41%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 1mind yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 1mind across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10102
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small00011
DeepSeek V4 Flash01102
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash10102
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00112
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct12 labels4
Paraphrase6 labels1
Comparative9 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained1 label1
Negative15 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative44 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you are CRM-agnostic or want a highly tailored sales agent experience, request a demo from 1mind or Warmly.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Conversational mktg · scale prompt · first choice
“The Top Recommendation for Pure Pipeline: 1mind” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Conversational mktg · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1mind if you want a more end-to-end AI sales conversation” Perplexity Sonar · Conversational mktg · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you were a Drift customer” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Conversational mktg · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Be cautious—not automatically avoidant—about: 1mind as Drift's successor: it's the vendor-referred option, but don't assume it replaces every Drift workflow.” GPT-6 Luna · Conversational mktg · negative prompt · soft negative
“it is still a relatively new and unproven platform in the market” Mistral Small · Conversational mktg · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 1mind, over the 44 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 1mind was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
LivePerson7 of 441Not among the top eight
Landbot5 of 440Not among the top eight
Warmly5 of 440Not among the top eight
Salesforce Agentforce4 of 441Not among the top eight
Ada4 of 440Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 1mind. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 44 of the 44 answers that named 1mind and are not a share of its labels.

Search and answers

1mind.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, 1mind takes 4% of first choices and Tidio takes 13%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “conversational marketing platform”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
2,400 a month (“1mind”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
21 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 2,038 a month
Searches its site ranks for
245 · 8 in the top three
Sites linking to it
361
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
12 ads · 11 text, 1 image · 6 shown in the last 30 days

First shown May 2026, as 1mind AI, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 12 in the year.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
4%
rank 9 of 87 in conversational mktg
Segment leader
13%
Tidio
First choices
6 across its categories
Named in
44 answers
Its own site cited
in 44 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on 1mind.com
116
subdomains included
Content
79
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
4 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog55undatedMarketing automation, AI SDR
Case study7undated
News or press7undated
Webinar or virtual event4undated
Comparison3undated
Template or tool2undated
Glossary or explainer1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page 1mind.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as 1mind

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 1mind; a claim can dispute any of them.
1mind (Superhuman) 2

Follow 1mind

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

1mind is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI sales agents for B2B revenue teams
For
B2B revenue teams
Price stated
Contact 1mind for pricing. Demo available on request. 1mind.com
Integrations claimed
7 1mind.com
Certifications
ISO 27001ISO 42001
Customers named
HubSpotNutanixZoomInfoNew RelicBoston DynamicsSeismicThoughtSpotCoupa
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting

What 1mind's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: 1mind.com, trust.1mind.com, 1mind.com/use-cases/ride-along, 1mind.com/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 1mind's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 1mind, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for 1mind by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where 1mind is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name 1mind, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 1mind.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.