GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › 1mind · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

1mind

5Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. 1mind was named 3 times in AI SDR, where Apollo.io led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market34 of 71

under the label threshold

Enterprise31 of 60

under the label threshold

In ai sdr · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 1mind for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI SDR agents	Sales	0%	34 of 71	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Apollo.io at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 1mind yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 1mind across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1mind covers avatar-led inbound conversations” Llama 4 Maverick · AI SDR · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 1mind, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 1mind was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Breakout5 of 52Not in the top three

AiSDR5 of 51Not in the top three

11x5 of 50Not in the top three

Artisan5 of 50Not in the top three

Clodura AI5 of 50Not in the top three

Intercom5 of 50Not in the top three

Qualified5 of 50Not in the top three

Salesforce Agentforce5 of 50Not in the top three

Amplemarket3 of 50Not in the top three

Reply Jason AI3 of 50Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 1mind. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 1 of the 5 answers that named 1mind and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

11x.ai1

amplemarket.com1

getbreakout.ai1

getvoip.com1

snov.io1

warmly.ai1

Six of the six domain citations in answers naming 1mind came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

11x.ai/guides/ai-sdr-agents-b2b-sales-teams1

amplemarket.com/blog/best-ai-sales-agents1

getbreakout.ai/blog/10-best-ai-sdr-agents-20261

getvoip.com/ai-sdr-agents1

snov.io/blog/best-ai-sdr-tools1

warmly.ai/p/blog/ai-sdr-agents1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as 1mind

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as 1mind; a claim can dispute any of them.

1mind (Superhuman) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 1mind's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 1mind, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 1mind.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.