GTM AI Index

Index › Vendors › Kissflow · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Kissflow

13Judge labels

0First choices

3Negative labels

8 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Kissflow was named 3 times in Automation & iPaaS, where Workato led with 38%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business67 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market17 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprise26 of 116

under the label threshold

In automation & ipaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kissflow for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workflow automation and iPaaS	GTM data and infrastructure	0%	17 of 76	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Workato at 38%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kissflow yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kissflow across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“designed to serve mid-market and enterprise organizations and is better suited to truly complex, process-based companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Automation & iPaaS · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kissflow, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kissflow was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Power Automate11 of 132Not in the top three

Zapier11 of 132Not in the top three

Workato10 of 136Not in the top three

Make10 of 132Not in the top three

n8n9 of 130Not in the top three

UiPath5 of 130Not in the top three

Boomi4 of 130Not in the top three

MuleSoft4 of 130Not in the top three

Nintex3 of 130Not in the top three

ServiceNow3 of 130Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kissflow. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 13 answers that named Kissflow and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

atlassian.com4

guideflow.com4

reddit.com4

ones.com3

betasystems.com2

celoxis.com2

fiverr.com2

invensislearning.com2

kissflow.comYour site2

monday.com2

Twenty-five of the twenty-seven domain citations in answers naming Kissflow came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

atlassian.com/agile/project-management/workflow-automation-software4

guideflow.com/blog/workflow-automation-platforms4

reddit.com/r/ITManagers/comments/1soh54t/enterprise_workflow_orchestration_platforms3

betasystems.com/resources/blog/enterprise-workflow-tools2

celoxis.com/article/workflow-management-software2

fiverr.com/resources/guides/business/top-six-workflow-automation-software2

invensislearning.com/blog/best-workflow-automation-software2

snaplogic.com/blog/workflow-automation-tools-mid-size-companies2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kissflow's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kissflow, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at kissflow.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.