Index › Products › Kantata · October 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Kantata

16Judge labels

0First choices

6Negative labels

9 / 14Models named it

2Categories

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

5 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Kantata was named 5 times in Marketing resource mgt and 1 other category, where Wrike for Marketing led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business102 of 107

under the label threshold

Mid-market25 of 110

under the label threshold

Enterprise23 of 83

under the label threshold

In marketing resource mgt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Kantata for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Marketing resource management	Marketing	0%	25 of 110	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24%
Client onboarding platforms	Customer	0%	70 of 104	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rocketlane at 47%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Kantata yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Kantata across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative16 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for people-centric resourcing.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Kantata, over the 16 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Kantata was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Asana9 of 162Not among the top eight

monday.com Work Management9 of 162Not among the top eight

Aprimo9 of 161Not among the top eight

Wrike for Marketing9 of 160Not among the top eight

Screendragon6 of 160Not among the top eight

Adobe Campaign5 of 160Not among the top eight

Resource Guru5 of 160Not among the top eight

Smartsheet4 of 160Not among the top eight

Teamwork.com4 of 160Not among the top eight

Adobe Workfront3 of 160Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Kantata. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 15 of the 16 answers that named Kantata and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

learn.g2.com11

thecmo.com11

teamwork.com10

g2.com8

cleverly.co7

clickup.com6

guideflow.com6

techdogs.com6

gitnux.org5

softwareadvice.com5

No domain is on file for Kantata, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

thecmo.com/tools/best-mrm-software11

teamwork.com/blog/marketing-resource-management10

learn.g2.com/best-marketing-resource-management-software9

cleverly.co/blog/marketing-management-software7

clickup.com/blog/marketing-resource-management-software6

g2.com/categories/marketing-resource-management5

guideflow.com/blog/best-marketing-resource-management-software5

soku.ai/blog/marketing-resource-management-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Kantata stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 3,600 a month (“kantata”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 50 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 25 of 110 in marketing resource mgt

Segment leader

24%

Wrike for Marketing

First choices: 0 across its categories
Named in: 16 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Kantata

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Kantata's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Kantata, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Kantata by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Kantata is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Kantata, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.