Index › Products › Resource Guru · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Resource Guru

13Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

5 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10-05.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Resource Guru was named 4 times in Marketing resource mgt, where Wrike for Marketing led with 24%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business17 of 107

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 110

under the label threshold

Enterprise66 of 83

under the label threshold

In marketing resource mgt · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Resource Guru for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Marketing resource management	Marketing	0%	24 of 110	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Wrike for Marketing at 24%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Resource Guru yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Resource Guru across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Simpler option for availability-driven booking without heavy planning” Kimi K2 · Marketing resource mgt · negative prompt · alternative

“Best for visual capacity planning.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Marketing resource mgt · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Resource Guru, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Resource Guru was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wrike for Marketing12 of 131Not among the top eight

monday.com Work Management10 of 133Not among the top eight

Asana10 of 132Not among the top eight

ClickUp8 of 133Not among the top eight

Aprimo8 of 131Not among the top eight

Screendragon6 of 130Not among the top eight

Kantata5 of 130Not among the top eight

Productive4 of 130Not among the top eight

Smartsheet4 of 130Not among the top eight

Adobe Workfront3 of 130Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Resource Guru. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Resource Guru and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

thecmo.com10

clickup.com9

guideflow.com9

learn.g2.com9

teamwork.com9

g2.com8

gitnux.org8

techdogs.com8

mailmodo.com7

soku.ai7

No domain is on file for Resource Guru, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

thecmo.com/tools/best-mrm-software10

clickup.com/blog/marketing-resource-management-software9

learn.g2.com/best-marketing-resource-management-software8

teamwork.com/blog/marketing-resource-management8

g2.com/categories/marketing-resource-management7

gitnux.org/best/marketing-resource-management-software7

mailmodo.com/marketing-stash/marketing-resource-management-software7

soku.ai/blog/marketing-resource-management-software7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Follow Resource Guru

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Resource Guru's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Resource Guru, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Resource Guru by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Resource Guru is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Resource Guru, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.