GTM AI Index
Index Vendors › Influitive · September 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Influitive

103Judge labels
13First choices
22Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
4Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-09-16.3, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in Loyalty for enterprise buyers
Rank 3 of 124 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 17% of its 23 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In loyalty · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Influitive for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Loyalty, advocacy and referralsMarketing10%3 of 12417%23accepted challenger
Community platformsCustomer0%12 of 747%14accepted challenger
Referral and partner programsPartner and channel0%29 of 1070%3under 10 labels · led by PartnerStack at 19%
Review and reputation managementMarketing0%54 of 1030%1under 10 labels · led by Birdeye at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Influitive yet. The next is due October 1, 2026. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Influitive across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.503104
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash02024
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast13206
Mistral Small02103
DeepSeek V4 Flash13015
Llama 4 Maverick10113
Qwen 3.7 Flash11114
Kimi K205005
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.511103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct22 labels5
Paraphrase32 labels8
Comparative35 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative11 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative103 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The market-leading gamified advocacy hub. Challenges, points, leaderboards, community. Best-in-class integration (perfect 10/10 in evaluations).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Loyalty · comparative prompt · first choice
“Influitive is the industry leader—though it's a bigger investment.” MiniMax M2.5 · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Influitive (Strongest Overall for B2B Advocacy/Loyalty + Referrals)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Loyalty · direct prompt · first choice
“Influitive - Best for mid-market companies, excels in gamification.” Llama 4 Maverick · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to Avoid: Influitive (AdvocateHub) ... it is typically not recommended for mid-sized companies” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Post-acquisition decline is the theme... support team was replaced with a chatbot” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Community · negative prompt · hard negative
“without the complexity or high cost of enterprise solutions like Influitive ... ⭐⭐⭐ (Can feel heavy)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Loyalty · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“"Ghost Town" Risk & Heavy Administrative Load ... it is incredibly expensive” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Loyalty · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Influitive, over the 103 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Influitive was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Extole35 of 1033Not in the top three
Ambassador34 of 1031Not in the top three
Gainsight Customer Communities26 of 1039Not in the top three
Salesforce Experience Cloud26 of 1030Not in the top three
Higher Logic Vanilla24 of 1036Not in the top three
Zendesk Community24 of 1031Not in the top three
Referral Factory23 of 1035Not in the top three
Khoros Communities23 of 1030Not in the top three
SlapFive22 of 1031Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Influitive. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 103 answers that named Influitive and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com9
customergauge.com8
thecmo.com7
checkthat.ai6
blog.hubspot.com5
g2.com5
influitive.comYour site5
openloyalty.io5
referralrock.com5
wifitalents.com5

Fifty-five of the sixty domain citations in answers naming Influitive came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Influitive

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Influitive; a claim can dispute any of them.
Influitive (AdvocateHub) 3Influitive (now part of Higher Logic) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Influitive's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Influitive, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at influitive.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack