| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Address verification tools | GTM data and infrastructure | 4% | 5 of 108 | 10% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“I'd typically recommend starting with Google Address Validation or Melissa” MiniMax M2.5 · Address verification · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“1. Google Address Validation API — Best Free Ongoing Option” Kimi K2 · Address verification · budget prompt · first choice
“U.S. ecommerce checkout: Compare Smarty and Google” GPT-6 Luna · Address verification · comparative prompt · first choice
“Unrivaled consumer-facing mapping and global visual autocomplete... Limitations: It is often "too permissive" for shipping logistics.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Address verification · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Generally not CASS-certified, so less ideal for postal compliance needs” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Address verification · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 32 of the 33 answers that named Google Address Validation API and are not a share of its labels.
135 of the 151 domain citations in answers naming Google Address Validation API came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
Fetched September 14, 2026, with a correction applied. These describe the company, not the product's standing, and a claimed page can dispute any of them. · Wikidata
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Address Validation API's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Address Validation API, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Address Validation API by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: